As a type 1 diabetic with multiple attachments already this sounds great.
GetOffMyLan
joined 3 months ago
This dude is clearly looking to get laid and I bet it's very clear from the way he approaches people. You're assuming they aren't creeping.
Honestly I would just commit your in progress work then on the other machine check it out and reset to the previous commit.
Then you have your in progress work on the new machine with no random commits.
You could set up an alias that does commit with message "switching machines" and pushes.
Similar have one that pulls and resets.
Some people just don't like swearing. Nothing wrong with that. The publisher's goal is to get readers so it's an easy way to not reduce numbers.
He wouldn't be able to do it if he was losing money though.
It's such a tricky subject.
If you don't use it to make money you can't do it anymore.
So is making money off it bad if you use that money to doore.
Holy crap lol this response made OPs edit the most incorrect thing I've ever seen.
You have to trust the person you're communicating with has turned it off. That's my point. It's an optional feature
There's literally an option to turn it off
It can be turned off so it's up to the person you're messaging. Once you send something the person at the other end is in control of what happens to it.
It's 100% not a borrow checker because c# doesn't have borrowing. It's just static analysis to ensure memory safety. But the author acknowledges that.
It's just checking the scopes the variables are defined in in the first example.