GissaMittJobb

joined 2 years ago
[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 13 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The management team can lead by example and forgo their salaries in that case.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 1 points 22 hours ago

You can avoid clogging problems when trimming your bears by not flushing the hairs down the drain in the first place. I usually try to trim into a small trashcan primarily, and the remaining hairs I wipe away with some toilet paper and throw in the trash.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 2 points 22 hours ago

Sodium hydroxide can also damage your pipes, so I don't necessarily know that it's a good replacement in this case.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think that was the joke

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

You're going to be sabotaging yourself if you don't use Android Studio.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 4 points 5 days ago

Quite literally yes

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 9 points 5 days ago

We get encouraged to try out AI tools for various purposes to see where we can find value out of them, if any. There are some use-cases where the tech makes sense when wielded correctly, and in those cases I make use of it. In other cases, I don't.

So far, I suspect we may be striking a decent balance. I have however noticed a concern trend of people copy-pasting unfiltered slop as a response to various scenarios, which is obviously not helpful.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 week ago

Non-engineering positions

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Big tech pays large amounts of money. This is why people choose to work there.

[–] GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml -5 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I have figured it out: many of them.

Great! I salute your rigour in the matter. How many of them was it?

And no, Amnesty did not produce a significant amount of primary evidence. You're just straight up lying now.

There are 430 hits for "Amnesty International interview" as sources.

Who knows, maybe they just interviewed Adrian Zenz for all of those claims. The joke would very much be on me in that case

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/26684168

Interestingly worded title - did the car drive itself into the crowd? No, right? Then why would they word it like that?

Anyway, more evidence to support the fact that cars are far too efficient as weapons to be granted as much free rein as they are today. Bollards save lives, implement them liberally throughout any areas with pedestrians.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/25961823

It's probably time we admit cars that are a bit too useful as weapons to continue affording them the vast uncritical access they currently enjoy in our built environments.

 

It's probably time we admit cars that are a bit too useful as weapons to continue affording them the vast uncritical access they currently enjoy in our built environments.

 

This post is inspired by me seeing an ambulance in the bike lane by the apartment building opposite of mine.

By this point, I'm sure we've all had just about enough of anti-urbanists and NIMBYs claiming in bad faith that bike lanes and bus lanes will be obstructive for emergency vehicles, and as such cannot be built.

You're probably well aware that exactly the opposite is the case - cars are the principal obstruction for emergency vehicles, and emergency vehicles can actually make very efficient use of bike and bus lanes to shorten response times.

I propose that we flip the argument on its head by rebranding bike and bus lanes as Emergency Vehicle-lanes, which just so happen to afford permission to buses and bikes when not in active use by emergency vehicles (which is of course already the case, everyone is required to yield any space to emergency vehicles, at least where I live).

This way, we kill this particular argument against bike and bus lanes in its crib, and expose the opposition as being actually against emergency vehicle mobility, in favour of having more lanes to drive their cars on.

Let me know what you think!

 

I'm having issues getting the app to behave in a predictable manner with regards to localization.

For reference, my system locales are:

  1. en_SE
  2. sv_SE
  3. es_ES

With this locale setup, I expect my apps to be presented in English whenever possible. However, Summit defaults to Swedish under these circumstances. I tried overriding the locale in the app settings and setting it to en_GB, which is a slight improvement, but the app seems to "forget" the setting after a while being backgrounded and reverts to Swedish. Occasionally, the List-screen is in English, but Detail-screens are in Swedish.

Finally, when using this overridden locale, the keyboard also defaults to en_GB, while I prefer my keyboard to always follow the default locale whenever possible. I'm not sure if this is something overridden in the app or if it's caused by the temporary override I have on language in the app, but I figured it should be mentioned.

 

I'm getting close to the bottom of my backlog on a few podcasts, so I'm looking to get something new in there.

Personally, it's been, in no particular order:

  • If Books Could Kill
  • Darknet Diaries
  • Hard Fork
  • 99% Invisible
  • The War on Cars
  • The Urbanist Agenda
  • The Climate Denier's Playbook
  • Well There's Your Problem

I'm mildly considering getting into Behind the Bastards and It Could Happen Here, but I'm a little bit skeptical on account of how damn much there is to be listened to in their feed.

0
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by GissaMittJobb@lemmy.ml to c/bikecommuting@lemmy.ml
 

I'm currently commuting around 12 km one way, which takes me 30 minutes. How long is your commute?

view more: next ›