GreyEyedGhost

joined 1 year ago
[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Your Telesat review is very biased. I didn't know who they were until today, but they've been operating geo satellites for 60 years. They also don't manufacture satellites, so their track record will have less bearing on how those satellites are made. Also, it says in the current article that the previous $1.3 billion deal didn't go through. I tried to find more info, but the closest I got was Telesat's press release that mentioned it being subject to various conditions, which may not have been met. That actually increases my confidence, since before they were going to just give them some money if certain conditions were met, and not they're just getting a loan. Now, whether they actually pay it back... I'd be unsurprised to learn that part of their preparation for this was going public in 2021.

I'd be a little concerned about the manufacturer, MDA, who has gone through a number of mergers and spin-offs over the decades. I'm not certain, but it's possible that Telesat and MDA had divisions that were spun off into each other at one point. They could have a strong core, or it could have all been sold off and the key people moved on. The fact they still have the Canadarm team and were selected for the first phase of Canadarm 3 gives a little hope, but has no bearing on their capability to manufacture the satellites needed for this array. That said, they do have some history with the antennas and such required for this project.

In short, neither of the key players in this satellite project are new entries, and in fact have had many successful projects over decades. Hopefully this project takes them to new heights.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I live within 20 kilometers of a major city. My options for high-speed were 5/1 DSL for $75 or Starlink, with the costs you described. I suppose 5 megabits would be enough if I limited myself to non-streaming services or only one person using those services at a time, but anyone who thinks that was a reasonable alternative in 2023 probably isn't participating in the modern technological world, either.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

This is where I am. If he just stepped back and followed the laws for whichever region he was providing service in, I wouldn't have a problem with it being provided by an egotistic asshole. But he has done other than that a number of times, and that's a problem. All this ignores the national security issues, which people should have gotten a refresher on during COVID with the N95 mask issues.

Sometimes the more expensive option just makes sense if national security is a factor.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I'm pretty sure you're conflating the American situation with the Canadian one. America gave various telecoms about $4 billion to expand their networks, with which they did nothing. Canada did other stupid things, such as put a program in place to increase rural broadband in 2019, which is really late to the game, or, in Manitoba, where I live, just give a fiber network laid by a government-owned utility to a local ISP.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Sodium ion batteries are really just hitting the mainstream. Prior to now, they appear to have been more from pilot projects/factories, but a couple large factories are being built now. I expect they will be very popular for stationary use in a couple years.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

And then there was a giant inquest where a judge said using special powers wasn't necessary, but didn't say "...if the authorities who should have dealt with it had done their jobs"?

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Yeah, the Google Maps equivalent that you're flying around in is the massive amount of data. The flight sim part isn't insignificant, but the massive amounts of canned data will be all those maps.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

I don't get it either. I also don't get why people would want to watch a bunch of guys scramble around a field after an oblong ball and give each other TBIs, but, hey, people can enjoy whatever they want. I don't need to criticize them for it. So, why do you feel that need?

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 month ago

The people who sell electricity are surprisingly happy to sell you electricity. If you happen to do something horribly wrong and don't burn your house down, an electrician will be happy to do the repairs. If you have 200 Amp service and draw the full 200 all year long, the most significant reaction would probably be getting a personalized Christmas card.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

So we will be able to definitively identify online harassers using "burner accounts", but we explicitly won't have a Digital ID. And how would you do that? Are we outlawing VPNs and the Tor network? Are we requiring Canadian citizens to sign up to social media using verified accounts so they can be handed over if abuse occurs? How will they identify if you're a Canadian and subject to these laws? The same way Texas determines you're an adult and can view porn?

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 months ago

This ignores that, until we had an effective treatment program and mass vaccinations, it had a mortality rate of about 20 times that of the flu. After effective treatment plans, vaccines, antivirals, etc. it was brought more in line with the flu. 0.5% mortality means that you need to know 200 people who got sick to know someone who died. This also ignores all the people we saw online who would deny their family members died of COVID. Having had friends working in hospitals, COVID deaths were happening. And let's be honest, how many people have you personally run into who died of the flu, yet that happens every year. We just shrug and move on. They were old, it was their time. And if it was your child, it was devastating, but could you even relate if your friend's infant had died of the flu?

People historically are really bad at statistical analysis, so tiny risks over huge occurrences are dismissed, and most people will get away with it so we feel like the bad outcomes didn't happen at all. But they do, and they did, and now a lot more people died than had to because people couldn't stay home when they were sick, or wear a mask in public, or not cough in other people's faces because it's just a flu. And I honestly can't show any respect to people who think their life is so much more important than anyone else's that they can't show a little respect and just try to not risk a stranger's health because it might be a little uncomfortable.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

So I'm supposed to just buy your anti-intellectualism rhetoric? Why should I trust your dumb ass over an expert in the field?

view more: ‹ prev next ›