GreyEyedGhost

Exact opposite for me. Couldn't figure out what it was, and took a bit for the forks perception to stabilize after the poster said it was that.

His citizenship hasn't been revoked. That's like saying Trump should be in jail. Sure, but where does he sleep at night?

He's been an American for 23 years.

And question 12, looks like the intent was below circle 3, but they put below circle 2. So is it a typo, or another intentionally ambiguous question where you can fail whoever you want?

Looking at the partners on that page, I think at least half of them are more than okay with Collective Shout's actions.

Okay, I see what you're saying there. I don't agree with the stance for the first part, but that's a personal choice. After all, the government could not only not incentivize building in a flood zone, they could make it illegal.

And I'm aware of unexpected turbulence...I just don't see getting banged about that big a deal. Shit happens. Wrong place, wrong time... Sure, put on your seatbelt when you're sitting down, but even if you don't you're probably not going to die from it

“J. E. Littlewood, a mathematician at Cambridge University, wrote about the law of truly large numbers in his 1986 book, "Littlewood's Miscellany." He said the average person is alert for about eight hours every day, and something happens to the average person about once a second. At this rate, you will experience 1 million events every thirty-five days. This means when you say the chances of something happening are one in a million, it also means about once a month. The monthly miracle is called Littlewood's Law.” - David McRaney

This is why people build houses in flood zones. What are the odds this will affect me? And every year, people gamble with those one in a million odds, and someone loses. Then their friends console each other at the funeral that it was a freak accident and who could have predicted it would happen? And why were they in that position? Because people don't have an intuitive grasp of statistics, particularly low probability and high frequency, and what the are odds it will happen to them. But it's happening to someone all the time, and much more likely to the one who says, "Well, it probably won't be me."

There are certainly things that can be done better. My instance should give an idea about how much my government can do about this problem. That said, just like in a car, there is no good reason you shouldn't be wearing your seat belt most of the time. And there are plenty of situations they can't fix, such as clear-air turbulence. But the seat belt still helps.

There are things you can control and things you can't. I can't keep the planes out of each other's airspace, but I can keep my seat belt on.

That would be more insightful if I wasn't a pilot...

Just a nitpick, but the legal term is beyond a reasonable doubt. So if 5 people see me do something, there's no reasonable doubt. But if 5 people see me do something, I have an identical twin, and a couple people who actually know me were hanging out with me somewhere else, well maybe those other 5 people saw my hypothetical twin.

This is the way I was going. Beans, rice, and cheese burritos, with plenty of veggies and salsa to round things out. Pretty wholesome, lots of nutrients, complete protein. You'd never starve. Enchiladas are an excellent variation.

Well, it looks like you're seeing two side to this topic and I, and possibly the op, see at least 3.