Guest_User

joined 1 year ago
[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Neither does window. A file deletion did not cause this. A human at Crowdstrike uploaded a bug to production. Bugs in production can happen on any OS, this is just a terrible, terrible look for Crowdstrike because they seriously messed up

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (8 children)

Two quick points, given the massive impact of this eveny it is clear to say many critical systems run windows. Meaning them being windows doesn't make them any less "actual computers".

Also, the OS in this event is irrelevant. They could have botched an update to their Linux version and crashes all the Linux boxes leaving windows untouched. This was not a result of an issue of any OS but a bad update.

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Really cool idea! I agree on the whole most people are incredibly nice and will go out of their way to explain their reasoning. But a small, loud group seems to crop up in political discussions. It's interesting because it's not always they they don't know they're being rude, but rather they know and are proud of it because of their beliefs.

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They absolutely gained unauthorized access to the data. Their access was not intended or sanctioned. If it was intended to be public and accessible like it was, this wouldn't be a story and they wouldn't have locked down the access.

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

They absolutely exploited unintended functionality. If this was intended, they wouldn't have added rate limiting and locked down the api after. It was clear to say this was certainly not an intended use of the api.

In a video game for example, if there is a an item that caused excessive lagging just by placing the item. Placing a lot of them with the intent to lag the game would be an exploit. They only used items sanctioned by the game, but for unintended reasons and they would likely be banned for exploitation.

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (3 children)

They gained unauthorized access. From that guys definition that is a hack, no an exploit

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Come on man, stop giving them good ideas!

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I think that would just be a hypervisor

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Isreal is a bit busy at the moment. Would be cool to have a wholly home grown resurgence though!

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

They mentioned their car uses 3.3 kwh per mile. With their solar setup they can generate around 6hwh per hour. Meaning they can generate roughly 2 miles every hour of sunlight.

[–] Guest_User@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Oh I see that error now. I guess I just assumed from context his 6kwh panels generated 2 miles per hour. I get the confusion though

view more: next ›