Hamartiogonic

joined 1 year ago
[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 7 points 7 months ago

People don’t read the contracts, so companies just exploit that habit.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 months ago

Making money, by attracting attention is the primary goal. Spreading falsehood is just “business as usual”. Informing the public is a byproduct of the core business.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So, if I use espresso cups or even dollhouse cups, I can easily hit that optimal cup number with a very small amount of coffee. 😁

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 16 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Here’s the interesting bit.

“The association between coffee consumption and all-cause mortality was U-shaped; coffee intake seemed optimal at 3–5 cups/d with the lowest risk at 4 cups/d (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.53, 0.88). Our results suggest that coffee consumption may be associated with a lower risk of CRC recurrence and all-cause mortality.”

Well, what exactly counts as a cup then?

“Coffee consumption in cups/d was then calculated by multiplying the frequency of consumption per day by the number of cups that were consumed. We further accounted for the differences in the sizes of cups by multiplying coffee in cups/d by 1 (for cup) or 1.5 (for mug).“

I guess the traditional 100 ml cups and the common 200 ml cups are all just cups, whereas 300 ml mug is clearly a mug. Who knows really, when the data is all self reported. I guess my 400 ml/d consumption should be roughly optimal.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 7 months ago

“The truth may be out there, but lies are inside your head.” – Terry Pratchett

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 4 points 7 months ago

Well, that’s exactly what the voting buttons are for.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 14 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Reminds me of Youtube. Guns and drugs, don’t make advertiser friendly videos, and that’s why the platform only barely tolerates those videos. From the predictive of YT, they demand resources without giving any direct revenue. I can see the reason why those channels tend struggle so much.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 1 points 8 months ago

People who stay there regardless, totally had it coming.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 26 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Let that sinking ship join Myspace and Tumblr already. Revolting may rise awareness of the problem, but it isn’t going to change the direction where Reddit is headed. They need to become profitable, and they’ve decided to do that by backstabbing the users.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 14 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Closer to 15 years ago. Skype and WhatsApp (before the FB nonsense) were viable options to SMS as long as your friends were also using the same app.

Although, the viability also depended on the price you had to pay for the data. If it’s like 1.5 €/MB, sending snail mail suddenly seems like a very appealing alternative. Some time around 2003-2005 there was still one company that actually charged that much while all the competitors were switching to monthly packages or even unlimited plans. The price range was absolutely wild back then.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 3 points 8 months ago

LOL. Just need a bigger stone.

[–] Hamartiogonic@sopuli.xyz 20 points 8 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (5 children)

If you pull the Moon closer to the Earth, gravity will begin to disintegrate it and shred it into kwazillion asteroids that eventually become meteors which will bombard the Earth back to the lava age. Once that is done, the moon doesn’t exist and there’s no need to go to the moon ever again. Problem solved.

view more: ‹ prev next ›