HessiaNerd

joined 1 year ago
[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago

Interesting correlary

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o8hnM6xNjeU&t=0

We've been headed down this path a long time.

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (11 children)

California has the second largest population of Republicans in the US after Texas.

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 29 points 1 week ago

Seek expensive medical care where the doctors will run tests then do nothing and let you bleed to death in the parking lot. Do this or go to jail.

Yeah, that makes sense.

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

I remember liking the design of the Xperia active. https://m.gsmarena.com/sony_ericsson_xperia_active-3998.php

The fact that it was waterproof, had the built in strap holder for securing it.

Make it lightweight durable and super long battery life (small screen, OLED) and you have a great device you wouldn't need to baby.

Unfortunately it's never going to happen. They don't do niche phones now. Everyone seems to have accepted phones are going to be generic slabs of glass. All about the same size. Boring.

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 8 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

They moved the other actresses hand up to cover more of her face too (in an attempt to match the original poster)

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You answered your own question. So they don't need a warrant. For a fee, they can run ALL DNA collected against just about everyone, no probable cause required.

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

All the more reason for broader legislation than a half baked idea about buying just this one database.

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 40 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Honestly, the law enforcement implications of the government buying the database is just as scary as a 3rd party. Hell I bet a company buys the data and sells access to the FBI, and local law enforcement for a subscription fee.

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They DID agree to share it.

Should that have been an option? Probably not, but now you are talking about legislation with wider implications, not some half baked public trust to protect a small group of people.

There are other databases of genetic code out there you know. The FBI can potentially accuse you of a crime based on your cousin uploading info to a genealogy website.

https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/crime/2023/02/06/police-are-using-genealogy-sites-to-solve-crime-heres-what-to-know/69826173007/

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (12 children)

Why should they?

Anyone who used 23 and Me agreed that their genetic code was able to be used my 23 and Me for whatever they want. Why is it now the job of the government to jump in and give those people retroactive protection.

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I always hear this when this quote comes up now:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PpaiHlQrwBw&t=0

[–] HessiaNerd@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Any tips for learning docker. I got it up and running on a raspberry pi following tutorials but can't seem to figure out how to connect the dots with the project I'm trying to get running on it. The project assumes I know docker so their documentation is non existent. I can't seem to find what I need in docker's documentation. I'm kinda stuck.

view more: next ›