ImADifferentBird
When they run candidates for lower offices in "safe" districts, and can win seats there. At that point, they can force the Dems into coalition building.
Or when the Republican party has about as much influence as the Libertarian and Constitution parties. Either/or.
Dunno if you've seen much of the LP, but they are definitely not socially liberal.
Honestly, they could take over the Libertarian party quite easily. It's not like its current leadership is particularly effective.
Donald Trump is openly talking about deploying the military against leftist protestors and calling them "the enemy within".
No matter what Biden and Harris are doing, they're not doing that. They're not fucking Kent State-ing people.
One of the reasons I love my town is there is a great, thriving small business culture. It's relatively easy to shop local for a lot of things.
That said, it can be expensive, and there are certainly things it's not easy to find locally, so sometimes I do, unfortunately, turn to Amazon. But I try to minimize it.
The funny thing is, if they did endorse Harris, probably nobody would notice or care. But the fact that they were stopped from endorsing Harris is now a huge story.
Jeff Bezos, meet Barbara Streisand.
I'd be willing to bet that the billionaire owners had more to do with that than you think.
They don't spend all that money on trusted media outlets to not control the narrative.
Have you considered that they've encountered enough people who only ever seem to criticize Harris and accusing anyone who supports her of loving genocide, and suspiciously avoid saying a word about the other guy, that they, themselves, have stopped giving the benefit of the doubt?
I'm not sure how you can make a statement like that and then whine about people assuming bad faith, but you do you.
Then I suppose we are in agreement.
Not sure why you are in here calling people genocide lovers for pointing that out though.
You want to move more right than Trump? You find Trump too centrist?
What the actual fuck