They didn't fit the agenda so they had to be removed.
Jako301
joined 1 year ago
Most games suffering from cheaters are at least partially free. LOL, Valorant, COD, CSGO, Fortnite, Overwatch, Various MMOs.
Getting a new bot-leveled account for any of these games costs somewhere from 0.30€ to 5€. Ban one account and they just use the next one for pretty much free.
Most of these games do account ban waves every few weeks to months, but if its this easy to create new accounts that's useless. IP bans aren't possible anymore since public IPs are dynamic and change every few days to weeks. Hardware bans, while technically possible, can still be circumvented easily by spoofing your mac-address and serial numbers.
The only way to minimise cheating would be linking your Social security number (or the equivalent for your Country) with your account, which leads to a lot of privacy issues. And even that isn't foolproof. LoL in Korea already uses this system and still has issues with a lot of trolls, scripters and wintraders.
The first crack took around 4 days.
The only difference us that cheats now cost more money than before.
I'd much rather have the USA as a world leader, but considering that neither if them are anywhere near that level of control, giving my data to China is the better option.
If the US has my data and the worst case happens, i.e. anything in my data labels me as a terrorist (let's be honest, nothing else matters to the NSA, they don't care about your day to day life), then the possibility is high that my own government gets a hint and I'm locked up pretty quickly.
If China has my data the worst case is that I can't set foot into China, that's it.
Both options are shit, but having their data in China means less possible harm for anyone that isn't a Chinese or Russian citizen.
Meh, Windows itself, even with all the bloat still active, doesn't need more than 2 Gigs. That's one of the few issues microsoft isn't responsible for.
They are improving a few percent every other year, but never in big jumps like these headlines would suggest
Firefox is not the better browser in anything but privacy. Maybe it could win in customisability, but that's something only a few percent of users care about.
It has longer load times and sometimes breaks sites entirely while using about the same resources. Yes, the reason for that is that website creators don't deliberately support it, but the normal user only cares about functionality.
I still use it and recommend it to anyone that asks, but saying that it's the better browser is just delusional.
On what server side? If 1 in 100 sites asks for your ID, then you simply use the other 99 that don't. There are so many clones of different porn sites that don't give a single fuck about regulations, why would they care about that law.
Torrenting in Germany can cost you hundreds to thousands if you get caught (And they do look for people doing so). Streaming on the other hand is barely worth a fine.
Games that are sold on GOG are usually also DRM free on steam. Sometimes the steamworks DRM is required, but that's so easy to trick that the games can still be considered DRM free.
The only thing GOG does is pre-filtering for DRM free only.
Other posts about this topic have similar claims. No idea who started the idea, but it gets mentioned a lot that ticking a box is all that's required
I also wouldn't mind Biden shooting him. Maybe the Republicans then change their minds about gun controll.