Jesus_666

joined 7 months ago
[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

Garuda for me. The reasons are similar; just replace some optimization with some convenience. It's a bit garish by default but pleasant to use.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Flatpak has its benefits, but there are tradeoffs as well. I think it makes a lot of sense for proprietary software.

For everything else I do prefer native packages since they have fewer issues with interop. The space efficiency isn't even that important to me; even if space issues should arise, those are relatively easy to work around. But if your password manager can't talk to your browser because the security model has no solution for safe arbitrary IPC, you're SOL.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 40 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

There's less than thirty of these in the wild so seeing one end up as bycatch is a sobering reminder of the consequences of overfishing. If we don't start taking ocean preservation seriously we might at some point find that not just the Virginia-class but all nuclear-powered cruise missile fast attack submarines have gone extinct.

And you can't even safely eat them; they're full of heavy metals like uranium.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Or Garuda. Sure, the theme it applies to KDE by default is pretty garish but nothing keeps you from just going to System Settings and seeing a different theme. Other than that it's basically just Arch with a bunch of stuff preinstalled and some convenience scripts.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (6 children)

I'd argue that simple chores can be used to help inmates get used to structured work as part of a reintegration effort. Of course that only makes sense if reintegration is the main goal of the prison system, which isn't the case in the United States.

In any way, if inmates were to do labor, they'd have to be subject to labor law including worker protections and minimum wage provisions. That would probably require the United States to abolish slavery first, which isn't going to happen anytime soon.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Milky oolong. It has just the right amount of sweetness and just evokes feelings of coziness for me. Sometimes I add a little bit of jasmine as well.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I agree that going for wages in the traditional sense doesn't catch many of the most relevant income streams. However, I think that a "maximum wage" makes sense as a theoretical construct used to create a sensible income tax scheme.

Essentially, tax brackets and rates could be defined in relation to the median income. Go too far above that (hitting the "maximum wage") and your tax rate rapidly increases, maybe even going as high as 90%. Of course this would have to cover all sorts of income, not just plain money.

This scheme would effectively box people into a certain band of acceptable wealth and would create an incentive to raise wages – after all, if the average worker makes more, so can the most wealthy.

(Also, full agreement on needing to talk about better labor protections. American labor law is really lax.)

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Mind you, people probably don't think of your standard high earner they they think of an income cap. They think of people who make four (or even five) digits an hour, a rate that maybe high end lawyers can match. Maybe.

CEOs of large companies can easily make that much, often not even tied to performance but contractually guaranteed. The super-rich make that much simply by existing.

Basically, if your labor (or mere existence) isn't even worth 1000 bucks an hour to your clients you're a peasant like the rest of us and an income cap is probably never going to be relevant to you.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

But you can tune the specifications of the yarn to theoretically make the socks up to 2% more comfy. In practice your tuning efforts will make the socks less comfortable and tear more easily.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 3 points 2 weeks ago

Exactly. If this was "Marathon: Return to Deimos" or "Marathon: Battleroid Arena" or even "Marathon Infinity Plus One" I wouldn't complain. Much.

But just taking the name (and logo) of the original one? The game that started Bungie's path towards being one of the big names of the FPS genre? That's like saying they went straight from Pathways Into Darkness to Halo. That's not honoring Marathon, it's a soulless recycling of an old IP.

My vent cores feel distinctly unblasted.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (6 children)

Man, I hate it when they make new games that have exactly the same name as an older game by the same company. And this one's not even a remake. I have no idea if Marathon (1994) and Marathon (upcoming) even play in the same universe but they don't seem to have much in common gameplay-wise. Ugh.

Makes me wanna install ~~M1A1~~ Aleph One (didn't know it does M1 directly these days) and shoot some Pfhor, though.

[–] Jesus_666@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

"You finished a computer game, Atticus."

The truth was a burning green crack through my brain.

Credits scrolling by, a reminder of the talent behind a just-finished journey. The feeling of triumph, slowly replaced by the creeping grayness of ordinary life.

I had finished a computer game. Funny as hell, it was the most horrible thing I could think of.

view more: next ›