Jimmycrackcrack

Yeh you don't like it, sure, but the question was whether it had gotten worse in some way that's quantifiable different to how it used to be in the past, or if it's just OP's personal taste changing.

The other day I made butter chicken and it was one of the best butter chickens I'd had, at least as good as restaurant quality. Can't wait to make it again and it was my 2nd try ever so I think I nailed it pretty quick. Wicked proud of that.

Cheaper for other customers, the meth head lady wasn't described as buying those same candles. She seemed to have taken issue with OP besmirching the good name of the retail store that scams elderly people by pointing out that they'd made a mistake on their labelling. So depending how you look at it, it's even worse because the situation didn't have anything to do with her.

No it means behind that mosaic this whole time was just boiled eggs

There's better answers here addressing the unlikeliness of contract killers existing in the sense of a freelancer available for hire to all the general public rather than someone trusted by peers in a criminal enterprise and also about the "contract" not really being a contract because it's unenforceable but I think you could also draw the conclusion just by reasoning alone that if a contract killer in that Hollywood sense of the term existed, and breached their contract and you the client don't have the personal connections or power to threaten that particular assassin's life in response, there's always just good old reputation at stake. I mean, it wouldn't help you in your specific case if they've nicked off with the money and left your target very much alive but to have hired them in the first place would have required word of mouth in hopefully a pretty small community of people since you can't exactly expect to find them on fiverr so you could make it know pretty quickly that this person doesn't honour their contracts so their wet work career would be over pretty quick.

What would it look like if they "got it"? They'd still have chosen one or the other, I don't know how I'd distinguish between this outcome that indicates they don't get it and one where they apparently do.

You should ask chatGPT

Well I mean, what would you say in that position? It's hardly going to help any to come out and announce that everything is fucked and you'd probably also be pretty disinclined to say nothing of note was achieved in your own administration or that there isn't really enough time to do much of anything in the remaining period.

Definitely pretty pointy elbows

It also sounds like based on the preceding post that they really are going to have to do this as the initial reaction to offending their coworker seems not to have gone down well with them and their colleagues at all. It looks like they're kind of having to do this to prevent things escalating any further which might be why their apology has needed to be workshopped and people are finding flaws in it. They're probably having to work through a fair bit of resentment before they can find an authentic apology in themselves. Good for them though, that can take a bit of reflection and the initial instinct can be to try and issue a non-apology apology but instead they're working through it to get it right.

A lot of the response here has been around the way the 'apology' focusses too much on the person who's supposed to be receiving the apology and not the person who has something to apologise for. The intended draft follows along the classic lines of "sorry if you feel that way" which implies that the person being apologized to is really the one in the wrong for having taken offence and the apologizer is just indignant at being forced to say anything rather than actually sorry for anything.

I get all that, but... Is there no way to sincerely express being sorry for not considering or anticipating another person's individual response to something as opposed to the thing itself? Without seemingly blaming them for that response? It's still about the apologiser's actions in having been inconsiderate in their deployment of language then, just not for the actual language. I ask because your proposed change "I'm going to work on improving my language" implies that the error was in using the word fuck at all and that their language is in general faulty in some way. I don't think that's the case. Having a manner of speech that includes that word is not something inherently bad, the bad behaviour necessitating an apology as I see it is for being too presumptive in assuming this particular person would have no problem with it when it's known that some people might and also for not immediately taking that person's offence seriously in the immediate aftermath when they expressed having taken offence (they didn't take it seriously, this is a follow up post).

It seems reasonable, if expressed very carefully, to commit to avoiding the word around them, since that's all that person can reasonably want, that's the problematic behaviour that is getting in the way of their working together. Committing to improving their language can really only mean committing to not saying that word generally which is defacto suggesting the word itself, not the lack of consideration is the problem and also puts OP in a position now of being on the hook in future not just for using the word around this individual but in all other circumstances as well something they shouldn't promise. If the work environment is such that nobody else speaks like this and they're the only one then sure, it should have been common sense to begin with and such a commitment is a no brainer, but if it's otherwise common practice and it's just this one person they need to accommodate then that's what should be done, accommodating this one specific person in order not to offend in future and apologising in order to let them know that you hear them and consider their feelings important.

My dad got us a voodoo FX banshee on our home computer back in the day. I guess the first one I personally bought would have been a GTX 970