JohnnyCanuck

Watch your cornhole, bud.

You're basically just proving my point. The first half is "irrelevant", as you said, or "unrelated", as I said. You're filling in gaps from the first half to the second half.

The post goes (paraphrased): It seems like an oversight to not have this feature of having individuals in multiple households. It got me thinking. Companies can choose not to hire you if your parents weren't married.

You've filled in the "it got me thinking" with "....they encountered this issue with a minor thing, started reading up on it online, and when digging into that kind of stuff ended up reading on what the legal situation is...."

That's exactly what I said is the mental gymnastics in response to OP's question, and you're filing it in like they actually explained it.

Yeah, it feels like a big leap to go from the first part to the second. Like, how are they related? Hence, mental gymnastics.

But how many are going to want this feature? I'm betting the number of people who use the one household feature is already relatively small. And, that barely works properly as it is.

I'm not the one you asked, but: They're not discriminating, they have a feature that allows a group, maybe a household, to be managed together and share features. Going from "they don't support this niche feature" to "they're discriminating against me" is the mental gymnastics.

I bet you're a double dipper.

This is misinformation.

https://www.advocate.com/news/fact-check-canada-lgbtq-hotline

However, the number listed, 1-877-330-6366, does not connect to a Canadian government service. It connects to Trans Lifeline, a nonprofit, peer-led support line that has served both American and Canadian transgender people since 2014. No new Canadian hotline has been created for LGBTQ+ Americans.

It doesn't say it in this article, but it was triggered by a 15-year-old going for help.

A few red flags. It's a bible camp, it acts as a "rehab" centre, it has a message on its website in the chin language from Myanmar (interesting for the trafficking part.)

But... Maybe this one isn't actually that bad?

https://people.com/88-children-rescued-from-iowa-bible-camp-during-investigation-child-abuse-allegations-police-11756792

Does that matter anymore?

I love that this is a crosspost

Looks a bit like a seal skull to me.

Edit: maybe a South American sea lion

"Uhh, I was just saying hi, I didn't want your life story."

Or, to fit with the theme...

"Uh sir, this is a Wendy's."