JustMy2c

joined 1 year ago
[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Depends. In Holland it's very clear, not enough houses are being built for the amount of new/young people needing one.

This is because the destination plans FORCE an area to remajn same usage, business ind, agri, forest/nature, commercial. There is almost no mixing there.

The new projects that do continue are almost always mostly for richer people.

And the poor areas arnt desirable..

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Thatchers plan would have worked if and only when:

LAND IS PROVIDED FOR NEW PROJECTS (destination plan on national provincial and local level)

ALL INCOME FROM RENT TO BUY (or similar) IS SPEND ON NEW PROJECTS

ALL PROJECTS ARE GUARANTEED BY THE BUILDER (no excess costs for any reason : sign your profitable contract but then you are obliged to deliver exactly what is promised or you'll never get another gov project again)

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

No, it would BE BOUGHT by government at fair price (they know the fair price, just look your houses tax bill)

Or built by them.

And then rented out with a certain maximum rental price per Sq Mt like 10$ so 50sq m (500sq ft) = 500$/month

Most importantly, they would be obliged to make it Energy efficient by their contract with the state so much lower electric and heating bill, maybe even topped off with solar, would be small percentage of a new building but cut costs for actual people.

Not saying it's perfect in Holland (they have shortages because no new land available to build new social housing projects), but it sure works!

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 12 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I Holland we have woning bouw organisaties That are BY law obliged to offer services and structured management, checked by impartial state department and who can be relieved of function (transfering the properties to another organization or splitting them up etcetera). Yes, needs to be overview, laws and such. Maybe even subsidies for new buildings.

But NO PROFIT ANYWHERE.

Not for public basic housing. Come on, do we really wanna admit RUZZIA and CHINA beat us on this?

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 1 points 9 months ago

Correcto but maybe it DOES apply to most asked questions, if you know where I'm going with that

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Obviously but reddit is in the goldilocks zone where you get coherent intelligent stuff and humor and facts.

But it's still toxic for an Ai.

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 9 points 9 months ago

Suspect.... Not convict.

So An investigator can check it out. Nothing more

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee 0 points 9 months ago

Reddit is used more for Ai models as those....

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago (4 children)

True but it's reddit that's served as a base for most models....

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago

And I'm saying that reddit data is sublime for Ai. And specifically that it's invested with toxicity

[–] JustMy2c@lemm.ee -1 points 9 months ago (12 children)

I know we don't like them here but the word reddit is not banned (yet)

view more: ‹ prev next ›