KRAW

Have you not seen "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?"

B and C are already taken. Didn't check A

Every "hot take" in this thread is a regurgitation of what r/cooking has been saying for the past decade

If you are talking about the Fennec browser (i.e. Firefox on android), this link is not pointing to that.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Americans (which is citing https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDT1Y2022.B03001?q=B03001)

In 2022, Mexican Americans made up 11.2% of the US population and 58.9% of all Hispanic Americans.

In the US, yeah, you are more likely to speak to a Mexican than any other hispanic Spanish speaker.

I'm going to go against the grain and point out that these types of people generally live in areas where there are very few foreigners. The closest country with Spanish as their native language is Mexico. Given the lack of diverse exposure to people of different backgrounds, you can see whymany might default to Spanish speakers = Mexicans. That said, they are also likely to be undereducated as well...

It sounds like they think the movie is good, it just took too much money to make given it's lack of appeal to a wide audience. I think that makes sense.

I suppose it depends on your definition of open world, but areas are basically only connected through the hub world, i.e. the castle area. There is virtually nothing to do in the world other than fight the colossi. It's a great game, and certainly influential in its own right. However for better or for worse, I don't really think it fits the mold of a modern open world game, and that's specifically what BotW reimagined.

I mean, the similarities kind of begin and end with a character that can climb, use a sword, and ride a horse. SotC isn't even open-world.

Thank you for the clarification. Very cool project!

I'm not really an OS guy, so forgive me if this question has an obvious answer. When a thread migrates, it keeps its stack and register, thus any data contained within this can be used in the destination process (correct me if I'm wrong). Thus sending a message could be as simple as migrating a thread and having that thread copy data from its registers or stack memory to the current process's memory space. However, how does the thread find process-specific addresses and handles (e.g. a mutex)? For example, I'm picturing a scenario where you are implementing an MPI library and want to use thread migration to send (small) messages from one local process to another. The thread orchestrating the send simply loads the data from memory and migrates, but how will it know where to store the data to? Would there need to be a data structure stored in a fix offset in memory that contains the destination address of the receiving process?

~~come up with~~ regurgitate the best one-liner