You can divide culture and grammar. It's simple: your hypothetical long exchange can trchnically be expressed in the Japanese language at 1/5 the length and still retain grammatical correctness and meaning. i.e. the long exchange is not a result of the technical aspects of language, i.e. it has nothing to do with pronoun ommission. The cultural aspect of language is what makes the conversation long. And you're making a huge assumption about the context of the exchange. Is it between two strangers? Family members? Sibling? Friends? A king and a peasant? Classmates? All of these situations would have exchanges with different lengths and grammar, but this arises from the culture. We do the same thing in English too. On average, an email between a boss and an employee will probably be longer and more formal than between two friends, no? Not as long as an equivalent email in Japanese, but the same trend exists in both languages is my point.
KRAW
"Politness ping pong" has a lot less to do with the technical aspects of Japanese and more to co with cultural norms. i.e. it's not a design flaw in the grammar.
Have you not seen "Who Framed Roger Rabbit?"
B and C are already taken. Didn't check A
Every "hot take" in this thread is a regurgitation of what r/cooking has been saying for the past decade
If you are talking about the Fennec browser (i.e. Firefox on android), this link is not pointing to that.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_Americans (which is citing https://data.census.gov/table/ACSDT1Y2022.B03001?q=B03001)
In 2022, Mexican Americans made up 11.2% of the US population and 58.9% of all Hispanic Americans.
In the US, yeah, you are more likely to speak to a Mexican than any other hispanic Spanish speaker.
I'm going to go against the grain and point out that these types of people generally live in areas where there are very few foreigners. The closest country with Spanish as their native language is Mexico. Given the lack of diverse exposure to people of different backgrounds, you can see whymany might default to Spanish speakers = Mexicans. That said, they are also likely to be undereducated as well...
It sounds like they think the movie is good, it just took too much money to make given it's lack of appeal to a wide audience. I think that makes sense.
I suppose it depends on your definition of open world, but areas are basically only connected through the hub world, i.e. the castle area. There is virtually nothing to do in the world other than fight the colossi. It's a great game, and certainly influential in its own right. However for better or for worse, I don't really think it fits the mold of a modern open world game, and that's specifically what BotW reimagined.
I mean, the similarities kind of begin and end with a character that can climb, use a sword, and ride a horse. SotC isn't even open-world.
Gillian Anderson