Kevin11

joined 1 year ago
[–] Kevin11@lemdro.id 2 points 8 months ago (5 children)

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

My setup (it has been destroyed by Gabe)

[–] Kevin11@lemdro.id 3 points 10 months ago

Facts. Just talking to educated people today, it is clear that there is a major disparity in knowledge and understanding when it comes to technology.

And yeah. Download Tor for free and bada-bing bada-boom, your kid now has access to not only the entire internet, but also the actual dark side of the Internet. Which is arguably an even worse environment than just straight-up internet.

For now, the only real solution is good parenting. Which again, as you mentioned, is getting harder and harder.

Somewhat off-topic, but the general trend of anti-family sentiment in society troubles me for a number of reasons.

[–] Kevin11@lemdro.id 2 points 10 months ago

Until kids learn to bypass Net Nanny by using the Tor network.

I think the system is broken, but my opinion isn't of much value as I don't have a solution for the problem. It's a classic debate question.

[–] Kevin11@lemdro.id 1 points 10 months ago

I appreciate the comment!

If you've ever been a kid with stricter parents, you'll know that there's always a way around child-proofing. It's an unfortunate reality. Additionally, if you've ever been in a school, you'll know that if you add 'unblocked' to the end of your Google search, you'll find exactly what you wanted to find. Restrictions can only go so far. (Sorry, I don't mean this to sound snarky.)

I believe there is a fine line between censorship and limited availability. For instance, many of the internet's 'big brother' algorithms will recommend suggestive content right off the bat. I think, (and this is my personal opinion) that larger services such as social media sites, search engines, etc. should be held responsible for the content that their platform shows to children. I definitely think that a little checkbox saying "I'm over 18" is a token effort at best.

I'm conflicted on this matter, as I believe strongly in privacy and anonymity and in the open, collaborative nature of the Internet; but, on the other hand, allowing children unfettered access to said Internet has been proven to be a bad idea. So, I'm somewhat undecided on the issue as far as the role of government or the role of service providers.

Parental roles are clear, however. Thanks for your comment ant have a lovely evening.

[–] Kevin11@lemdro.id 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Precisely! Modernized, relevant internet safety courses! The current systems, at least what I've experienced, have really amounted to "don't talk to strange people in chat rooms" and I...

Oh.

[–] Kevin11@lemdro.id 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Is there an r/woosh alternative?

[–] Kevin11@lemdro.id 25 points 10 months ago (12 children)

I think everyone can agree that child safety is important. But the fact internet as it stands is not safe for kids is completely undeniable.

As always, however, censorship is not the solution, especially not if it's headed by government. I'm honestly not sure what the solution is.

[–] Kevin11@lemdro.id -4 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Actually, if it would mean that they'd stop asking me for money every time I use it, I could get behind that

[–] Kevin11@lemdro.id 1 points 1 year ago

I was given two options, so I pitted the two phones against each other. Pros and cons, you know? And then the winner was the phone I got.

[–] Kevin11@lemdro.id 2 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile, in Canada

view more: next ›