Klnsfw

joined 1 year ago
[–] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 13 hours ago

For over a century, that's more or less what the raised fist has meant.

To specifically mean "eat the rich", I suggest a variation : contract and relaxe the fist muscles, as if it were chewing something.

[–] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 week ago

By "fuck", you mean "rape"?

[–] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 week ago

And one fine morning, the other sites you visit regularly will apply a policy that has become the norm elsewhere.

[–] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Typical scorpio humor

[–] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 4 weeks ago
[–] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 4 weeks ago (5 children)

I don't think I would survive a predator. What my brain is supposed to see ?

[–] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 month ago

Yes, because it's okay to punch Nazis

[–] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 month ago

Could it be 3 different days ? Because I don't want to spend one day per week staring at my walls

[–] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

In France, voting day is always a Sunday. And if you work on a Sunday (most people don't), your boss has to schedule your working day so that you can go and vote.

[–] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 5 points 1 month ago

You're right. The rules are not the same with your own cats. One of my cats likes long blinks (aka "eye kisses"), and for an other one it's a call to play and cuddle on the rug.

[–] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Also, avoid direct eye contact, and never ever stare into their eyes. This is the equivalent of an oath of blood and despair.

That's something people who don't own a cat don't understand: the less you look at them, the more friendly they think you are (that's why cats love allergic persons)

[–] Klnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 month ago

Firstly, the more students there are, the less time the teacher can devote to them individually. When there's a comprehension problem, it's really in the interaction that things can be sorted out: understanding why the person doesn't understand, explaining from different angles, etc.

And all the time spent with one person leaves the rest of the group on its own, which can very quickly dissipate all the group's attention, with a few whispered personal discussions turning into hubbub.

What's more, the larger the group, the easier and more tempting it is for weak and shy students to hide in the crowd. In a small group, the teacher should regularly check that no one is left behind. With 100 people, this is strictly impossible.

Finally, I don't believe in the argument that the more people you have, the more friends and studying partners you can find. Socially, we get together in small groups (between 2 and 6, roughly speaking) no matter what's going on. I think that beyond this limit, there's a diminishing return (unconsciously): a new person brings less than reinforcing the group's cohesion. If the group gets any bigger, it's going to reshape itself by affinity into smaller, tighter-knit groups.

Rating: I don't believe in rating system. If I say 3/10, can you change 20% of your idea to reach 5/10? What's 20% of an idea ? Would 5/10 be good enough? Can you change 70% of an idea to reach perfection? In this case, why don't we live in a perfect world?

view more: next ›