KoboldCoterie

“[Horse Armor] must have been [sold] in the millions, it had to be millions,” Nesmith said. “I don’t know the actual number, I probably did at one point, I just no longer remember that. And that was kind of a head shaker for us: you’re all making fun of it and yet you buy it.”

And that right there is the reason why the industry is absolutely saturated with this shit now. If people had just chilled the fuck out when this shit was first introduced, made sure it was an absolute flop from a sales perspective (not only for this one, but for others that were released back then, too), we might be in a better place now.

Sure, but she's been doing plenty of interviews, and declined this one up front, while he's been skipping out on most of the ones he's already scheduled. Not really comparable.

Kbin and Kbin

This sounds like a lawfirm name you'd see advertised on TV.

"Did your post get unjustly deleted? Unfair moderator actions? Admins getting you down? Call Kbin and Kbin for a free consultation TODAY!"

The geography is also a huge contributor. To protest something on a national scale needs significantly greater buy-in from the country as a whole than protesting something on a national scale in a European country. We have a huge amount of land area over here and with the exception of major cities, we're very spread out.

Spain is one of the larger European countries, and is about 500k sq. km, as an example. The US is about 9.1 million sq. km.

Protests happen on local scales but they don't make national news, only the really massive ones do, and those require a lot of coordination and time investment from the participants just to show up.

It's all just framing, no? You could frame all of your examples of protesting to "improve something" as protesting against something, and vice versa.

Protesting for improved living conditions is just protesting against poor living conditions. Protesting for higher wages is protesting against low wages. Protesting for lower tuition costs is protesting against high tuition.

Protests by definition are an action objecting to a thing. What are you seeing happen in other countries that's so different to what's happening here, when you don't selectively frame it as "for" a cause rather than "against" a thing?

Cruelty to animals is one of the few instances where I'm personally okay with unreasonably harsh punishments. Specifically cases like this. There's just no reason for it, no benefits, nothing was gained. It's just cruelty for the sake of cruelty, and anyone who's capable of doing that can, as far as I'm concerned, rot in prison or burn in hell. Alternately just treat them exactly like they treated the animals.

This is kind of up to the individual community, not the instance as a whole. An instance theoretically could make a general 'No memes on any community on this instance' rule but it would be awful to enforce, and it'd be easier to leave it up to communities.

That said, I think Lemmy is a long way off from having the userbase or popularity to create that problem, and the absence of karma or any analogue really narrows the impact. Personally, I've seen significantly less low-effort content here than on Reddit, with the exception of a few specific communities that exist for that purpose specifically.

I'm not going to purchase the document to find out, and the abstract doesn't really cover it, but I'm curious what the methodology was here. I seriously doubt that piracy is that prevalent. It's possible that people are upset with certain companies and aim to pirate their games, and the fact that those companies are the same ones that use Denuvo is happenstance. It's also possible that they're using total downloads of pirated copies vs. total sales as their statistic, which is misleading, because I'd wager the majority of folks who pirate the game would not have purchased it if it wasn't available to download for free.

I'd also be curious if the price of the game was a factor; I imagine more people are looking to pirate a game priced at $70 than one priced at $40, for example.

Really, there's too many factors to consider here and I don't think there's a reasonable way to say how many folks who pirated a given game actually would have purchased it.

This is the shit government should be working to correct, if they weren't all in it for the money just as much as the corporations.

Corporations and the general population have an innately antagonistic relationship. Corporations want to make as much money as possible, the general population wants to spend as little as possible, so their goals are diametrically opposed. (I'm pooling Uber drivers in with the general population here, because they're in the same position - being opposed to Uber's goals.)

Corporations inherently hold more power in this relationship; they have more money than even large groups of individuals, so they can hire expensive teams of lawyers and accountants and professionals of all kinds to further their goals, while it's difficult if not impossible for normal folks to organize against a corporation in any meaningful way.

In a system that worked, the government would be working to protect the population from corporate interests. They'd be spending the bulk of their time identifying and closing loopholes like this one, and enacting laws to make exploiting these loopholes not worth it, and generally would be the arm of the people.

Instead, corporations pay government, and the government looks the other way - if not directly supports them - while they fuck over everyone they can - and the planet, while they're at it -to reap wealth. And this shit is the result.

TL;DR: Yes, except when acting as a spoiler for one candidate or the other. Nothing newsworthy here.

Just imagine how much better everything will be once Trump no longer has a platform amplifying every inane thing that comes out of his mouth.

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Literally right in the side bar.