Every day? But not at the scale where I need to view the whole globe
LesserAbe
My dogs prefer lettuce, as long as it's crispy
For me I think it helps to think of error correction. When two computers are exchanging information it's not just one way, like one machine just sends a continuous stream to the other and then you're done. The information is broken up into pieces, and the receiving machine might say "I didn't receive these packets can you resend." And there are also things like checking a hash to make sure the copied file matches the original file.
How much more error correction do you think we should have in human conversation, when your idea of the "file transfer protocol" is different than the other participant? "I think you're saying X, is that correct?" Even if you think you completely understand, a lot of times the answer is "no, actually... blah blah."
You brought up the idea of neurodivergents providing more detail, which can be helpful. But even there, one person may have a different idea about which details are relevant, or what the intended goal of the conversation is.
Taking a step beyond that, I recognize that I am not a computer, and I'm prone to making errors. I may think I'm perfectly conveying all the necessary information, but experience has shown that's not always true. Whether or not the problem is on my end or the other person's, if I'm trying to accomplish a given objective, it's in my personal interest to take extra steps to ensure there's no misunderstanding.
I think we should have open borders. That said, not everyone does. Many more people have a problem with citizens being detained because the supposed focus of these raids is people in the country illegally (and supposedly people who are criminals).
Talking about how they're detaining citizens highlights that the actions are indiscriminate, and that really they want to target any brown people. It shows they don't care about the law. It's also telling people in a protected class, "hey, they can come for you too."
I don't need anymore evidence of that, but some people do. And when we stop calling it out it becomes de facto acceptable.
I think chairs and tables are insufficiently different - people would end up using one as a substitute for the other. I think a more interesting question would be what if you were required to magically eliminate all perfectly level planes (tables, chairs, beds), or eliminate all slanted planes (ramps, screws, lazy boys)
I'm an atheist, but if you read about Jesus specifically you won't find a lot of hate.
The wizard is not a reasonable guy
The wizard who is forcing you to do this said you have to actually be playing, you can't be in a manager or commentator type role
Do people currently get paid to play naked twister? Seems like more of a collegiate level sport
I think this might be the answer

I have no mouth and I must beam