Libb

joined 2 years ago
[–] Libb@jlai.lu 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

But as I said, there’s a lot of people on Lemmy that think theft is okay.

Theft happening to others, maybe. Try stealing from them ;)

then it’s up to the moderators and/or admins to deal with that.

That being said, I agree this is the moderator's job to deal with it but keep in mind that:

  • Mods are benevolent and there aren't that many to begin with.
  • One may still need to report the issue for the mod to become aware of it.
[–] Libb@jlai.lu 4 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I’ve known Lemmy for a few hours and I feel like I’m back in the early spirit of the internet.

Welcome :)

It’s a bit of a digital version of rural exodus. And since 2017/2018, I’ve noticed that everything that, in my opinion, represented the internet has disappeared.

This a very interesting metaphor, real spot on.

But I would say a lot of that rural Internet has not disappeared, not yet. It's still there, very much alive. People are simply not visiting it anymore. They don't dare go outside the pretty walled-gardens they're used to.

But those people wanting to stay parked in their corporate-owned gardens, or silos, doesn't make that small and more humane web go away. And would they chose to, they could still come visit it freely, they could still easily interact with their creators. They could even create and tend to their very own part of it, making that small Web a richer place.

They just don't do it. Most of the time because they can't be bothered with doing the actual work, or because they're afraid to try and to fail. They want to be fed easy to eat content, not learn to cook it themselves.

They want the a Web that is like those shitty fast-food serving standardized and over-processed industrial food. Something ready to eat that is barely food at all but that will stuff their belly and, more importantly, that will never surprise them. Alas, this food is as much a poison for their head as it is for their body. They will realize that too late. It probably already is.

Too bad, because the alternative is still a thing, not that far away.

The small web is still a thing. Many blogs still exist that only share content their author sincerely care about or is interested in, that are ads and tracking free, that respect their readers... But the majority of people have quit visiting them, they simply don't go outside of, say, YT, X, Facebook, Reddit, Instagram, TikTok or whatever where they can all stay together parked like the cattle they have not yet realized they have become.

Back to your original metaphor. Digital rurality is still there and many could easily own a small part of it and make it exwactly like they want it to be, and be happy with it. But they prefer staying in the large over-crowed cities, in small overpriced apartments like most their friends are doing.

Lemmy is a great alternative to reddit but it could relatively easily become another silos—just plural and not corporate-owned but silos nonetheless. It's up to us to keep it open to the alternatives. I mean, sometimes I feel sad to see little posts & comments inviting people to go read/watch something they liked that is not already hosted on some corporate-owned platform. Heck, sharing personal content feels so much like a lost cause to me that I seldom share a link to my own blog posts: why bother? I also publish a lot less often than I used to, here again: why bother?

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 2 points 3 weeks ago

Using your example, you could be lying.

True that. It's even more interesting considering 'Libb' is not my real name, just the one I fancy using online. But I would say that it's beside the point of your question (which was not about the possibility one would be intentionally telling lies, just how much data makes a 'fact' reliable), still, it's obviously related.

But then... considering that for some undisclosed reason you could not get access to more (source of) info, how would you decide if I say the truth about my name or not, when at the same time next to me some people (more than one) are claiming I'm a liar and that my name is Gertrude? Maybe that can't be decided? Or that should not be? Or mayb the dude claiming his name should be given some extra credit? Or maybe not (I may say I'm but I doubt Elon Musk will admit I'm his natural son and that I should therefore be entitled to a part of his huge piles of money, plus change for the trauma I endured ;)

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 1 points 3 weeks ago

If I was to consider myself dependent to anything, I would say I'm more of an analog dependency kind of guy than a digital one.

I mean, I have a computer and a phone (and a tablet) and I know how to use them, but I also don't feel much excitement building up thinking about using them, at all. On the other hand, I enjoy doing analog and IRL activities.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 1 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I keep hearing “it isn’t the quantity…” and I do not understand why it isn’t seen as just as important as trustworthiness of source because even the best source needs a high amount of data to back up a claim.

consider my flat-earthers example: the trustworthiness of the source(s) is at least as important. If I told you my pseudo is 'Libb' you can bet that it is indeed so, even if that just me saying it. And that would remain true if, out of nowhere, 100s of people started telling you my pseudo was in reality 'Mickey' or 'Gertrude'. I would still be Libb. Conclusion? All by myself, against that hypotheticla large crowd, I'm still a more reliable source of info concerning my identity.

On the topic of flat earthers, did you ever see the video of the guy who tried to demonstrate the earth was flat and proved it was round? The look on his face was priceless. haha

No, and I'm almost wishing to see it. Almost.

I must admit the rise of flat earth theory came as a shock to me. I always have had a sweet spot for absurd theories but I could not imagine people taking those seriously. But maybe that's just me being manipulated/lobotomized by the government? As a matter of fact, I'm also a pro-vax and that may explain a lot :p

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 3 points 3 weeks ago

They licensed a lot of Disney, but Niko and Fantasio, Yoko Tsuno, and Asterix invoke such powerful nostalgia in a way that Disney, being so huge and a current part of the cultural zeitgeist, doesn’t.

So much :)

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 1 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

I would say, a good starting point would be a few examples of those so-called facts and their corresponding data.

Half-jokingly, I have little doubt I could find a lot of data demonstrating the earth is flat on flat-earth.org or whatever flat-earthers main website is called. But no matter the amount of data I would find there that still would not cut it as far as I'm concerned to accept their certainty as a fact—Incidentally, I also just answered your first question: it's not just the quantity of data, it's also its trustworthiness that should matter ;)

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I really need to look into Asterix again.

Nodding approvingly ;)

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 23 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

I'm well into my 50s and there have been two comics I have never grew tired of. Quite the contrary, the more I read them the more I love them. That is Goscinny & Uderzo Astérix (the albums they created together, not so much what came later), and Bill Watterson Calvin & Hobbes.

And in my very humble opinion, and if I have anything to say on that matter, if heaven has to be a thing I wish for it to be a Watterson comic strip.

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 1 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

Like with questions posted in a forum: at least, having little more to read than just its title ;)

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It is not anymore as far as I know, right?

[–] Libb@jlai.lu 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (4 children)

Waterfox

Edit: on my computer only as I don't surf the web with my phone (I don't know if there is a mobile version of Waterfox)

view more: ‹ prev next ›