Liz

Dang I always thought you had to go maglev to beat 300 mph. I guess the US really does have a shot at the world's fastest bullet train network.

Ain't no red-eye if your got a cubbyhole bed!

Yeah but you can get a pleasant experience overnight in a cubbyhole bed on a train. Functionally speaking, the time spent traveling while getting good sleep doesn't really count, does it? You were gonna have to sleep anyway. Good luck doing that on a plane. Plus then trains can be built to go right into the heart of downtown, meaning a much shorter "last mile," which planes can't really do. Then you got the airport vs train station experience, the café car on the train, the larger seats, etc etc etc

Ain't everything about the advertised speed.

I am too tired at the moment to really talk, but here are the systems we need to no longer need defensive voting.

Approval Voting

And

Sequential Proportional Approval Voting

The best you can do is teach him the tools with which to deal with and celebrate life.

I like ABA Naturally in terms of helping you practice getting into the mindset for "I want to understand why my kid is doing this, and teach them how to navigate life."

I assume Mom omitted the "my" in front of shoes, like she and expecting her own delivery and just thought it was hers without double-checking.

I love the way it looks. It's super easy to figure out where everything is. "Cutting edge" UI designers have a tendency to change things to justify their own existence. Is it easy for the user to navigate? Is it clear what does what? Great. Stick with your design language and only change it if you're forced to by some fundamental change that is incompatible with the framework you currently have.

I fucking hate how every time my phone updates something is bound to be changed with no obvious benefit. Even worse when they remove functionality I was reliant on.

I would guess literally 99% of people could switch to Linux Mint and be more than happy.

There's 7, including the applicant. They meant 3, then 4.

Yes I'm aware.

I am not saying everyone with dumb opinions is a bot, far from it. The world is drowning in idiots. But concentrations of message-friendly people is for sure one of the places you'd want to test narratives, not every message is intended for every audience. You need to recruit new folks to your cause and maintain your base. Messages that do well with your base are likely to attract cause-curious folks.

With pipeline stuff? Sure. There's an infrastructure cost involved in switching sources. With tanker and rail stuff? Nah, it's comparatively trivial to switch suppliers. Unfortunately for Russia, the most obvious declines are from pipeline sales in the first year of the war. The rest have decreased too, but those are the ones where you can just wave your hand at the graph and it's obvious. They basically can't afford to sell at market rate because their oil comes with too many indirect costs to the buyer at the moment.

More like, I'm trying to make a narrow point about international oil markets and they keep reading it as moral judgmet, East vs West, and/or Grand Narrative stuff. Also they keep getting verifiable facts wrong, which is annoying because then I have to correct them, distracting from the oil market conversation.

Anyway the reason I believe .ml is much more likely to have a higher bot ratio than other instances is that it's a convenient concentration of Russian and Chinese friendly people, where narratives can be tested. The good ones that resonate get pushed by other members of the bot network outside the test bed (along with organic sharing and so forth). There are other test environments for narratives, but both China and Russia are surely interested in .ml more than other fediverse spaces.

To be clear, Western interests also have a presence here, but they don't have the same kind of obvious choice for an instance to hang out in and test natives. I would guess they would pick lemmy.world to have more user-noise to hide in and less fear that their instance might collapse, but fuck if I know. In any case, we're very much the backwaters and testing grounds for these bot farms. They're not interested in us as some kind of nexus for narrative control, we're just one of the many many places they test out stories and see which ones are worth amplifying with their big accounts on big platforms.