He's in the middle of a set and someone starts yelling about some political issue...
Some political issue..? That's what the genocide is to you?
Llewellyn
joined 1 year ago
And added some of their own commentary
Keepass could have backdoors too. The difference is: authors of those backdoors are not from the same company, which I use as cloud storage.
I find risk slightly bigger when you encrypt your private data with the product of the company and store that encrypted data on servers of the same company.
Why: because if they have some backdoor now or plans to introduce it in future, they have all the time in the world to apply that backdoor to your data. Without you knowing it.
That different FOSS client stores your data on their company's server. It's an important factor, IMO.
If it was backdoored, many people would be calling that out.
In theory. And not necessarily soon. Don't forget the context of this thread: we compare bitwarden with keepass, which does not offer to you your password base on their server side.
I have an even better idea: make tool creators and / or CEO of the company, using the tool, liable for all tool's mistakes and hallucinations.
Which has the same concept as the LLM under the hood, hasn't it?
encrypted is the key word
Well, maybe I am more sensitive to such a matter because of being Russian.