LukeZaz

joined 1 year ago
[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

this is the era of AI

Uh, sure, so long as you define an "era" as "a period wherein a bunch of C-suites wet themselves over unproven tech." I hope you realize that something having a lot of money behind it for a few years isn't indicative that it's about to revolutionize the world. There are plenty of near-useless things that had lots of excitement behind them, and still didn't go anywhere.

I've seen what GenAI and LLMs can do. It's a magic trick; it looks impressive, but for almost every possible use case just isn't helpful, and unfortunately for all of us, the magicians (i.e. OpenAI et al) are douchebags on top. This is not tech worth advocating for.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 32 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This. After reading "huge surplus of money," I was expecting a 5-digit figure. At current running costs, $6k is two years of runtime, but this assumes in turn that expenses never increase and no emergencies occur, which is extremely unlikely over that time period. Better to save it, I think.

Of course, this all depends on what causes got suggested. I can't think of anything that'd be both worthwhile and (relatively) cheap, but who knows? Maybe something matching that description will come along.

It's also worth noting how much funding Beehaw is currently getting on a monthly/annual basis. I tried looking at the Open Collective page, but there's no easy figure or chart there to look at that I can find.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago

some guy said he doesn’t trust Americans to form a competent government

Not what he said.

and I said you’re an American?

Not what you said.

You don't seem to have an interest in understanding the impact of your own words, either before posting them or afterwards. No point in talking, then.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 2 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Well, considering I never voted for Trump, am against bigotry in all its forms, don't want to deport people for having the wrong skin color, believe that free healthcare is a human right, hate capitalism, etc... I don't think it's unfair to say that I very much am not like the fascists currently in power or the people who voted for them at all.

How is it fair to criticize me as though I'm the same as them when I'm fighting against them? Does my being born here somehow make me deserving of scorn?

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 1 points 4 days ago

I get accused of being a bot all the time now because I still enjoy writing long-form posts

From cecilkorik, who I was replying to. That kind of bot accusation scarcely ever occurred before LLMs entered the picture. You posted too hastily here and missed a huge chunk of context.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 4 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Yeah. I hear you there. Problem I usually have is that the odds of an accusation tend to scale less with posting style in my experience and more with level of disagreement, or whether or not the poster has personally witnessed something. Basically, "I didn't see this with my own two eyes/dislike you, so this is obviously bot behavior." It's a conspiracy theorist-like attitude, and it's predated LLMs entirely.

Nonetheless, I'm not happy that an entire new form of bot scrutiny has been introduced, and I absolutely cannot wait for GenAI/LLM hype to die the fuck down.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 2 points 5 days ago

And more! The current discontent at the Democrat Party and the pushes for reforming it have all the more chance of success if the Republicans start fracturing at the same time.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

I honestly have no idea how to respond to this. Did you read my comment and its context? Because I can't figure out what point you're even trying to make, so it really feels like you didn't.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 17 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I swear to God, some people these days will cry bot if someone so much as blinks unexpectedly. Chill.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 7 points 6 days ago (6 children)

If you want to shit on America the country, I'm with you. I could hardly disagree with the top comment in this chain; America is, after all, racist, bigoted and fascist right now. The nation, and especially the government, deserve all the vitriol.

But please don't shit on Americans writ large. Too many of us hate this just as much as you do, and we really don't appreciate being lumped in with those who enabled it.

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you! Absolutely insane that this article mentioned that 128 Democrats were so spineless but almost entirely refused to tell us who. (Not unexpected, mind you, but still insane.)

[–] LukeZaz@beehaw.org 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

there’s a full third who had a choice and refused to do anything

We've got at least two options for blame when it comes to the last election:

  • Politicians who wield actual power and use it to do nothing (at best)
  • Voters, largely struggling to survive, wielding little power, even in aggregate, due to a rigged system

I live for the day people blame the former instead of the latter, though I know I'll never see it.

 

SAN SALVADOR (AP) — Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen met with Kilmar Abrego Garcia on Thursday evening in El Salvador, coming face to face with the wrongly deported man after two days in the country pushing for his release.

The Democratic senator posted a photo of the meeting on X but did not provide an update on the status of Abrego Garcia, whose attorneys are fighting to force the Trump administration to facilitate his return to the U.S.

[...]

Van Hollen’s trip has become a partisan flashpoint in the U.S. as Democrats have seized on Abrego Garcia’s deportation as what they say is a cruel consequence of Trump’s disregard for the courts. A federal appeals court said Thursday in a blistering order that the Trump administration’s claim that it can’t do anything to free Abrego Garcia from an El Salvador prison and return him to the U.S. “ should be shocking. "

Republicans have criticized Democrats for defending the prisoner and argued that his deportation is part of a larger effort to reduce crime. White House officials have said that Abrego Garcia has ties to the MS-13 gang, but his attorneys say the government has provided no evidence of that and Abrego Garcia has never been charged with any crime related to such activity.

[...]

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials acknowledged in a court filing earlier this month that his deportation was an “ administrative error.” The government’s acknowledgment sparked immediate uproar from immigration advocates, but White House officials have dug in on the allegation that he’s a gang member and will not be returned to the United States.

[...]

The fight has also played out in contentious court filings, with repeated refusals from the government to tell a judge what it plans to do, if anything, to repatriate him.

[...]

Human rights groups have accused Bukele’s government of subjecting those jailed to “systematic use of torture and other mistreatment.” Officials there deny wrongdoing.

29
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by LukeZaz@beehaw.org to c/gaming@beehaw.org
 
 

Archive.

Noting that the title of the article is not terribly good, as the funds in question have already been appropriated for the purpose of the wall and are not new, and are in fact part of a "compromise" bill that also includes funding for asylum lawyers. Not that I want a compromise bill, or don't think she shouldn't push for better, but it's hardly big news.

That said, the real problem lies at the end:

Zoom in: Beyond embracing the bipartisan bill, Harris' campaign has portrayed her as an immigration hardliner in ads.

The bottom line: Like the wall itself, Harris' changes on border policy reflect how Trump has shifted the political debate on immigration during the past decade.

I am getting very, very sick of the trend of Democrats spending more time trying to appeal to bigoted conservatives than trying to actually represent their own constituents or help the people they ostensibly care about.

view more: next ›