Lutra

joined 1 year ago
[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

just to be clear, for fear we mentally normalize this

  1. this is hostile behavior from Chrome
  2. what the customer does with the browser, in a sane world, is of no concern of the guy who made it.

to accept that another person has one sided authority to determine what you can and can't do with a tool, after it is in your possession is weird.

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

then how does it know... that... nevermind

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 49 points 4 weeks ago

Kids, remember, Google is an advertising company.

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (2 children)

...and letting users know, at some level, they are analyzing every video uploaded to google drive.

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

One thing to note - The science is still calculating. Yet. SpaceX (and presumably others) are allowed to continue and increase what they're doing. This is the bass ackwards way to protect future us.

Its the same mentality as driving in a random direction for 20 minutes while someone looks in the car for the map on the off chance that when you get the map open you'll be where you wanted to be anyway.

It has the potential (and at this point, just the potential) for planet level changes, and is being done by one group. Should I, a random dude, be able to do something that might possibly affect the entire planet, and the planet as a whole just have to wait and see how it turns out?

The hopeful thought that its probably nothing, before anyone can prove that it's probably nothing, makes a bet where the short term wins are mine, but any long term losses are everyone else's.

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago

Nothing was taken away. It’s literally just combined with another port now. That's not how either Apple or Samsung adapters work. The converters to a bit more than change the shape of the plug.

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

I didn't respond to _any arguments you made. I thought you posed the question 'why?'

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago (10 children)

[ confirmation bias at play. you have switched to bluetooth. it meets or exceeds all your needs. you don't see much public indication to the contrary. you figure bluetooth is the best. ]

  1. simplicity the cable just works. no configuration. no pairing .un pairing, figuring why it worked yesterday

  2. Audio quality - bluetooth is lossy. we just were given AptX lossless in 2021 ( another confirmation bias ) "Sounds great to me" "I can't hear the difference".
    2 things are both possibly true though: I can't hear the difference. Other people hear a big difference. this seems impossible to some people. As if their senses are the apogee of human sense.

  3. lag. new codecs lower latency, but lag lag lag. You couldn't possibly use your device as a synth/music instrument and 'play' the lag is far to great. Same with games.

  4. whats the big deal. This is a bias for the plug users - would it hurt to keep it? we've always had it. The work is already done. Its already baked in the cake, why you gotta take it out?

  5. Investment - I have really good headphones. I have really good earbuds. Yes there are adapters but they are finicky exactly when you want them to just work. They inevitably break. They often downgrade the sound - I have 3 usb to audio adapters for android that all hiss for no reason.

The issue is that when the marketers are selling us a 'clean vision of the future' they purposefully gloss over the things they are taking away. Then they paint the people who feel pain because of the change as neanderthals who wouldn't know better if it bit them. When they do know better. They had better (for them) and progress made it worse (for them). To which the marketers generally say - you should be someone else.

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

167532282 :-) good times

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 0 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You are not the only one.

This weeks game of 'Internet pile-on'

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

its a good warning, but there's no new info here.

  • the scanners are usually not technically x-ray, some are mm wave, some are xray backscatter.
  • the technology can see through clothes and produce a grainy bw image of a naked person
  • the tech is very closed, and the customers are NDA'd into not letting the public know anything
  • the enhanced privacy changes don't change the device - its still taking naked pictures of people, its just doesn't show them to the operator.
  • before you look, as of a couple years ago there are just about 6 images from these devices out there on the internet. (iirc, there is a researcher who bought one off of ebay to study, but lost track of their work. )
  • its in use in border patrol type operations to see into the trailers, trucks and cars.
  • no one can prove they aren't keeping a database of naked people. ;-)

https://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/privacy/privacy-pia-tsa-ait.pdf

https://www.rapiscan-ase.com/resource-center/technology/z-backscatter-x-ray-imaging

view more: next ›