After closer look I can say this is great idea. Initially I thought this messes with Lit’s lifecycle bringing React’s lifecycle drawbacks but seems like it’s not. I think at some point you should get in touch with Lit devs and see if it can become part of Lit lab or even Lit itself
Lysergid
joined 1 year ago
Is it better than React functional components in any way? I don’t see benefit over React functional components or even Lit’s class components
That was my first thought, but is that much different for say Tesla. They get tax breaks and pay as low as they can. Don’t get me wrong I not protecting China’s way, I’m rather against both. But it would be interesting to see numbers from both sides
Do you have to unlock? You can open wallet from blocked screen without unlocking phone
Do you have to unlock? You can open wallet from blocked screen without unlocking phone
removed, stop buying your metal scrap and pay your devs. I wanna play Marathon this century
But it’s FAANG company, they know how to do best /s
I’m not sure how I feel about it. Don’t want this to cause “share” bots networks which will pump particular posters. Next logical think to do is to start showing more from those posters, which will kill the hole point of consuming content from fediverse for me. I don’t want to see same things from same people. I want diverse content from different posters
Top ten comments do not mention typo. What a hell is going on. It’s Lenuks, not Linux
Please, can you give an example of such code snippets? I’m wondering what people consider reusable in different projects.
To me, generated code should not be committed at all. Again, I know nothing about this stack but code generators can have different behavior on different machines due to versions, flags and even OS. To deliver consistent results they should run in consistent env. It’s build time concern which CI/CD should take care of.
He just applied Russians’ favorite soviet era saying “those who is not with us is against us”