MangoPenguin

joined 1 year ago
[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

That's why you have 2, there's no solution for long term storage that requires zero checking on things that I can think of.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The problem with tags is they can go out of date so quickly and require someone to update them, whereas most restaurants publish a menu on their website or ordering site, and google can pull info from that.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Yeah it would be nice to see a full menu and review system on top of an easy to use google maps replacement (both for mobile and web like google maps).

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Looks neat, but most of the time just sits on 'loading data' and when I can get it to load, doesn't show anything for like 100 mile radius around me lol

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 months ago (10 children)

Sort of, OSM doesn't really have much to search for. For example if I search "gluten free lunch" google will search the reviews and menus, and is pretty decent at showing me options. OSM would not be able to return anything most likely.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone -3 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Like, what technology normal person has access to counts at least as enthusiast level archival?

Cloud storage? Store it on 2 different providers like B2 and iDrive or something, pretty low complexity.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (14 children)

I don't like google selectively chooses to show certain businesses over others.

But at the same time the lower screenshot is just pure information overload, it has way too much going on for a casual map to use while walking around and that sort of thing.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

You can also delegate a subdomain to another provider with an API, but yes I see what you mean. Although I feel like getting port 80 open would be difficult as well in those situations.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

It does but it's a bit of a weird way of doing things.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 months ago (6 children)

I'd say they're actually easier, at least in my experience. Since wildcard certs use DNS-01 verification with an API, you don't need to deal with exposing port 80 directly to the internet.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 2 months ago (3 children)

You shouldn't have the do anything specific at all, local network stuff works without internet and Jellyfin doesn't rely on any internet servers like Plex does for authentication.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago

Turning off broadcast doesn't do that much IMO, any of the Wifi scanning tools will show those networks anyways.

view more: ‹ prev next ›