Melvin_Ferd

joined 2 years ago
[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Think more about the intended audience.

This isn't about melanoma. The media has been pushing yellow journalism like this regarding AI since it became big.

It's similar to how right wing media would push headlines about immigrant invasions. Hating on AI is the left's version of illegal immigrants.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago

Can't wait for the "electric cars are killing children" research next

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

Nope and I'm the average do you think the average person is reading all these articles every day. I got shit to do

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You know who else accepts historical sources, sovereign citizens and freemen-on-the-land. Historical texts are not exactly an authoritative source. It's a classification but isn't a concrete source.

If you cannot point to an authoritative source then I don't believe you to be a serious person. You can continue to express your opinion. But without evidence and sources there's nothing to do here and I think asking you to put forward a source has exposed this.

This is the same problem that radicalized trump supporters. It's the same argument I've seen with them early 2016. Society is broken therefore they used all kinds of niche sources to justify their opinion.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Not doing this. You tell me what you accept as an authority or source on this and I'll decide if it is reasonable or not. Just like if I was speaking to someone on vaccinations and they told me something like CDC or other health agencies globally are just too mainstream to do the real science and that they would only accept druthers. I need to know what your sources are to figure out if you're a serious person or not.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (5 children)

But I did and again this isn't a source. You claim my sources are from liberal sources then go on to justify a reality they suits you. I'm sorry but this is similar reasoning I saw during COVID with people who denied vaccines and masking. I provided sources from everything from media, authorities like dictionaries and university's and even historical quotes from political scientist. Marx fits this but is one of many lenses. The status quo is liberals are Left of center with some like classic liberals being more right of center.

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -5 points 1 day ago

Yea cut the shit. This isn't Reddit. That's idiotic

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Where the hell was it said he's a leader of any revolution.

There's no confusion. You'll either wake up one day and realize how late to the party you all are.

I have taken a step back which is why I'm able to see the issue. The problem is you're in it. You have blinders on.

The left is cooked. You're highlighting exactly why. The left act like we don't have decades of marketing and behavioral science that shows how to influence people.

Keep showing up for those protests and door knocking and when you lose, blame those low information voters and idiots who keep beating you while doing none of what you're doing

And if you think you can wear the defense that "well they're just supported with more money like Peter Thiel or Steve Bannon or Musk" it won't work. Their money is only doing what we all do for free except or effort is put towards vapid platforms and bean Sheeran moth posts. Theirs are focused and self organized

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

What reference. The only one was a link to something I had already shared and it linked to the one area of liberalism that is considered center or center right. So let me know which link I'd love to know

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago (7 children)

No, you are in .ml which is comparable to the trump supporters on the right. They have been radicalized and used various newspeak to create a unified voice that doesn't conform with standard knowledge. This is why I have shown all kinds of sources that reinforce the idea that liberalism is center left while everyone from .ml is strictly applying Marxist theory as if it's fact. Same experience arguing vaccines in r/conservative.

view more: ‹ prev next ›