Moonrise2473

joined 1 year ago
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 4 points 1 month ago

Train them to point at ultra common smells, then scam the customer saying it means need to eat some ultra expensive supplement, but only today there's a buy two get one free promotion

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 8 points 1 month ago

I have a Pixel but it would be better if software features are added to the os and not some kind of bullshit exclusive

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 11 points 1 month ago

It would be interesting to plug an usb rubber duckie to own that station and dump all the disk somewhere

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well the website says it comes back in stock next month

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

They absolutely can and should fix it, but in the end, IMHO, it's a mail server misconfiguration coupled with a slack issue, not a Zendesk security issue

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it -4 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Trying to do the devil's advocate: Zendesk isn't a mail server and all it's doing is to organize a million messages sent to a specific address in a neater way. A spam filter is also present because every email client needs it, but spoofed mails should be rejected by the mail server, not the clients.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 4 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Desktop apps in a WebView using vnc on a VM on a tablet are a miserable experience that nobody wants to endure

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 2 points 1 month ago

Yes, prestashop is faster than Woocommerce. I manage two e-commerce with both. But while with Woocommerce all I needed extra was a $15/lifetime stock synchronization plugin, with prestashop I would need $100/month of plugins to have feature parity. So I keep prestashop basic as an simpler store under a different domain that doesn't need stock synchronization or mass import or blog.

Odoo, I loved it at first sight when I tried the 30 day trial 5 years ago. So much snappier than Woocommerce, and with so many features. Its main problem was price and complexity. Official hosted version required a subscription for every single feature. Invoices? That's $19/month. List of clients? Another $19/month. Blog? Add $19/month. For the tiniest extra feature, needed a subscription. In the end the full package was completely unaffordable and the bare minimum was unusable. The free self hosted version is the most complex install that I had to do in my life. I installed a third party plugin and I broke it beyond recovery. Because it's in python it requires a dedicated server and not a normal hosting. Unless you're a Linux guru you have to pay for their hosting service. Luckily recently they realized that their pricing was unaffordable for everyone except huge corporations, so now the full package is around $20 per month.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I feel that's even worse than Woocommerce in that regard. There was a reason it was forked as thirty bees: v1.7 broke almost all the plugins and had a very slow adoption rate, and plugin developers continued to target 1.6 as it was more popular. The situation stalled for years

Edit: but as a e-commerce is faster than Woocommerce

Maybe, a good alternative that offers everything while also being fast is odoo. But you need to pay for their service, as the free version is very difficult to install and maintain

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 1 points 1 month ago

sure, but why solve problems in 10 minutes when i can do it way more sophisticated using 10x more time and resources?

(at the moment reverted to the easy html form + php send mail)

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

When I saw this post I assumed it was a parody

Really? A $100 alarm clock with WiFi that requires a Nintendo account subscription? It's going to be sold out tomorrow.

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's from a small startup with just a few devs and no resources, how could you expect to get more than a version update in its lifecycle

view more: ‹ prev next ›