It appeared it had access to the entire book - it linked me to a website that somehow had the text. I was able to coax better responses out of it when I corrected its mistakes about plot etc.
MooseInMaine
joined 1 day ago
That's a funny way to test it with a fake movie!
Ha ha. I'm experimenting with the technology.
It felt like a good reminder to me
What is the "boll"
I did have a much better discussion of 'Moby Dick' a while ago, but I imagine there is lots of info that AI has scraped from scholarly articles and the like about classics.
Point taken
The plot wanders around in a disorienting way. Characters who we were very focused on at one moment are all of a sudden dropped from the narrative in a hard-to-believe way. A lot of people apparently like it, but I’m stopping after the first book.
Struggling to understand Ben Aaronvitch’s Rivers of London. Recently read and like John Williams’ Stoner.
I didn't upload the book in this case. I could tell from the links that ChatGPT was using as references that it did have access to the full text through a website that had the text of the book, perhaps not legally.