MrPoopbutt

I can relate to that. I remember specific memories, but my situation has changed so much that I don't relate to being the same person

They and their donors would prefer thst over a Bernie win.

I say twenty oh one just because i dislike inconsistency and prefer twenty oh over two thousand

Dont issue that challenge to the universe

I'm sure the Republican govt will get right on that

We live in a post sanity world

I agree with your point, but pretend you are a moron for a minute.

Anyone who speaks well is now an "elite" and therefore cannot be trusted. Trump is automatically more trustworthy just because he speaks like an idiot and not "the elites who always lie".

"Eating dogs and cats? Man, that sounds like something cousin Dweebus would say. Cousin Dweebus and me go way back, I trust him. This guy must he for real".

One side is worse, but both sides ARE bad.

If democrats really wanted to improve our lives, they wouldn't have quashed Bernie in 2016 or 2020. What they did this year with Kamala was equivalent.

She was still a better choice in every possible aspect over Trump. It wasn't enough.

While you are technically correct (the best kind of correct), that does not subtract from the point.

Believe it or not, any sufficiently large group of people will have people who behave differently within it

What exactly did the Harris voters do to deserve this?

Who gives a fuck about the macroeconomic perspective

The economy, to any person with a pulse, means "can I afford to live". If the dictionary definition of an economy is different, then speak the language of the people.