Mr_WorldlyWiseman

joined 9 months ago
[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Wasn't Mamdani saying the whole campaign that he promised to keep the NYPD budget in return for the NYPD refocusing on violent crime and the NYPD leadership staying? If he pissed off the entire NYPD things would probably be more expensive.

Ah yes, everybody knows that New York has the ability to hand out capital punishment based on what you out on your tax return. Stupid liberal Mamdani, how did he not do this! /s

The difference is honestly closer to two orders of magnitude.

E = 1/2mv^2

1/2 * 1000kg * 50 km/h * 50 km/h * 0.2778 mh/skm * 0.2778 mh/skm = 96 kJ

1/2 * 100kg * 25 km/h * 25 km/h * 0.2778 mh/skm * 0.2778 mh/skm = 2 kJ

Stop signs and traffic lights only exist to stop cars from killing people, bicycles do not need stop signs.

It is safer for bicyclists to run stop signs than it is to come to a complete stop. Also who the fuck in 2026 actually stops at a stop sign? Nobody does.

Genuinely nobody follows stop signs. I think it's like 20% actually come to a stop?

With bicycles, it's safer to treat stop signs as a yield signs since coming to a full stop means you'll cross the intersection much more slowly than if you keep some speed.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

huh? I never wear a helmet outside of escooters but I'm not going to argue that no helmet is safer than helmet

I mean, plenty of people have differing views on this.

I think I would support the idea of private ownership, but owning things like land should pay a land tax. Ownership means that improvements that you make to your property come back to benefit you, and that it cannot be arbitrarly re-assigned away from you by your co-operative/government (taking this further, a veto right against a democratic majority taking your non-commodity property).

All regular work and production should be paid back to the workers in the form of voting shares in the democratic co-operative that owns the factory, to prevent authoritarian capitalists from embezzling labor like the billionaires do today.

But I understand that many disagree with these statist ideas.

I mean, all discussion is welcome. City planning is a complex topic.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

This is a common optical illusion with bike lanes. Bicycles are a lot smaller than cars and are 100x less likely to encounter traffic congestion, so bicycle traffic always looks much lighter than a similar number of cars.

The only way to be certain about traffic numbers is to do a traffic survey, where you actually go and count the traffic amount during rush hour.

Heres an example of a traffic counter where bicycle traffic looks a lot lighter than it actually is.

https://youtu.be/3F_B0HtewDU

Also, even if a bike lane is underutilized, it is often a first step towards a proper bike network. Once a bike network reaches a critical mass, the traffic grows exponentially as people feel safe biking and new kinds of business is enabled by bicycle transport.

In countries like the Netherlands it is very rare to build a road WITHOUT a bike path, and I think that should be the standard. We should be asking why it didn't have a bike lane when the road was first built.

[–] Mr_WorldlyWiseman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 weeks ago (10 children)

Not to defend the landlord here, but is all private ownership violence then?

view more: next ›