MxM111

joined 1 year ago
[–] MxM111@kbin.social 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

No, guilty pleasure.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Yes, he has chosen within available options according to the reasons you have described. Just because there is an explanation about the choice, it does not invalidate the existence of the choice. Acting according to your will is making choice.

It is the opposite that would indicate the absence of choice - if you out of free will wanted chocolate, but forced to take vanilla (by vanilla vigilante) - THEN you did not have a choice. But as long as you acting according to your preferences, it is your choice.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social -4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It is a fair option that I would never choose. Does not mean that nobody else do the same, or force me to take the option.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

How could they remove it loudly?

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

There are two reasons why I do not buy Tesla. 1) Elon musk. 2) absence of CarPlay. If Elon is gone, there is no reason(1), and I am sure CarPlay will be implemented quite soon after that.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 23 points 7 months ago (4 children)

At this point, the stock might go up. Elon’s reputation is probably negative now.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 0 points 7 months ago

We could make bitcoin and such unlawful. But making AI forbidden is good maybe for SciFi.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social -5 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Less AI is not an option. But more electricity is another alternative.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 16 points 7 months ago

Unrelated, but it is interesting that people ask for addictive games rather than for good games. Those are not the same.

[–] MxM111@kbin.social 28 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Nah. It is DOS with Norton Commander.

view more: ‹ prev next ›