MystikIncarnate

joined 2 years ago
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

IMO, there's no reason that vine needed to be shut down. There's so many ways to monetize that kind of platform, and they basically said "we can't figure it out" and closed up shop.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago

For feedback, I would just print off the federal labor codes for my country, highlighting specific sections. I'd just hand it to the management verbatim. I wouldn't cherry pick or leave anything out, just emphasize specific passages.

Guess what? That's illegal here.

It would be a thinly veiled threat that I'll ruin their lives if they don't back track immediately... All said without uttering a single syllable.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

IMO, not specifically Harlem shake, no, but Harlem shake was a product of the Internet in its prime.

IDK if that makes any sense

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago (9 children)

I'm not even sure what that means. I'm familiar with Harlem shake, but skibidi toilet?

The Internet is a weird place. I love it here.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

That's what I would have expected/assumed. I haven't had the time to review any of this in detail, so I'm not speaking from an informed position. Thus I generally keep my assumptions to myself.

Good to know.

As captain Picard said: it is possible to make no mistakes, and still lose.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's a fair point. I would argue that critique and constructive criticism should not be presented in a way that is, in and of itself.... Mean (to put it simply).

There's a lot of ways to do the wrong thing with the best intentions.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Genuine question: apart from the people who would profit from the activities she was fighting against, or the would-be patrons of such a business.... Why would anyone carry hate for what she was trying to accomplish?

I know there's a whole religious argument, which I find to be wretched at the foundation; just because you 'have dominion' over creatures does not imply that it's ok to torture them and/or kill them for their fur unnecessarily....

Anything else? I just can't think of anything.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I would assume that the trolls are attracted to those people because they get more of a reaction to their vitriol. It's sad, honestly.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Idk why. If it was the same person, the information is relevant to the discussion.

I'm happy to know that they were proud of what they were doing. I hope it was a light in their life.

It's terrible that anyone would hold any hate for someone trying to do the kind of work she was doing.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You're not necessarily wrong. I certainly don't have any information to refute what you say....

I'm just not sure that pointing this out on a post about a woman's death is enhancing the discussion at all, so I'm not sure why you felt the need to share....

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

That's the thing. You (and I) don't know she wasn't seeing a psychiatrist and/or mental health professional.

You can seek help and want to live while still losing the fight against suicidal ideation.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I don't understand why anyone would be mad that someone was saving foxes from becoming pelts.

Unless you're the piece of shit profiting from the suffering and death of those animals, in which case, your opinion is null and void, nobody should be against the idea IMO.

It's incredible to me that anyone would carry such vitriol against such a noble cause.

May she rest in peace.

view more: ‹ prev next ›