NewDark

joined 11 months ago
[–] NewDark@lemmings.world -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If they aren't occupiers...

Why doesn't Gaza have an airport? (it was destroyed in 2002 and not allowed to rebuild)

What happens when Gazan's go too far off the coast? (they get shot)

What happens when they go past the border wall? (they get shot)

But sure, maybe you like the term "under seige" better? Is that more accurate for you?

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Social media, not western news agencies. The news is highly biased toward Israel even if the people generally aren't falling for it.

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Please tell me you think it's justified to hold a child in prison for years for throwing a rock at a tank. Oh, or maybe they illegally walked on the wrong side of the road in the west bank. I really want to hear this.

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world -2 points 9 months ago

They act as a mediator for Israel to fund Hamas.

Not saying they've never given any of their own money to the governing body of a destitute open air prison, but that wouldn't be unique to them.

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The hostage deal was negotiated by Qatar, the Hamas leadership is living in luxury in Qatar

You're spelling out how they're acting like a neutral party here.

Qatar is seeking to gain more influence in the future of Gaza.

It's a destitute open air prison. Come on now.

Is this really the right moment to blindly trust the Qatar state owned news source with its reporting about a Qatar negotiated deal related to a conflict that Qatar has a vested interest in?

I don't blindly trust their reporting. It was one search result. Most of the details on Israeli actions and policy come straight from Israeli sources like B'Tselem.

Is it not true? You could tell me that with something backing it instead of complaining about a reputable source.

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Recognized as a non-member observer state, and the countries actively oppressing them currently do not.

The same ones that hand-wring endlessly about a "two state solution".

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 7 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Why not? They're a great source unless they're reporting on something related to Qatar's own government / interests.

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world -4 points 9 months ago (4 children)

Palestinians would love to be recognized as a state. Why aren't they?

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 37 points 9 months ago (23 children)

Many Palestinian prisoners aren't charged with crimes and have "secret evidence" held against them. Given Israel's track record of lying and colonialist activity, I'll leave you to decide if they actually do have that evidence. https://www.aljazeera.com/amp/news/2022/5/2/more-than-600-palestinians-held-by-israel-without-charge-or-trial

On top of that, the vast majority of the actual crimes are incredibly minor like rock throwing, and it doesn't matter if you're a child. The conditions and treatment in Israel prisons for Palestinians is incredibly grim as well.

There's a thin vaneer of an unjust legal framework, and the aims of Israel aren't as explicit to hold them for trade, but they're a whole lot closer to being hostages than most people care to admit.

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 7 points 10 months ago

You're aware of the existence of lying, right?

[–] NewDark@lemmings.world 2 points 10 months ago

I think it would be in your best interest to get a better understanding of the situation and history for the last 80 years or so of the region.

I hope for your own sake you grow to one day cringe at this sentiment, I believe in you.

view more: next ›