This is a thread about "leftists" who blame Biden for Israel aid but never say a word about Congress who actually has the role and responsibility to create and vote on the aid.
The person I am replying to claims he also blames the right for these things, but not once in his comment history has he ever called them out like he calls out the left.
You "blame" the Republicans so much you never once commented about their involvement in Israel until now, when you are called out on it.
Why is this a shit post? This is like straight out of Silicon Valley.
I respect that name
Much less ok to pretend both are the same
We are not accounting for the percentage of people who read it but are still cool with forfeiting their soul.
And let's be real, it's ok to be emotional and want attention. That's human.
But I'm sure this can be done, and is probably easier to accomplish by not being a nazi, which is the real issue here.
See, I consider microwave food to be unhealthy and overall bad for you. Which is why I'd rather skip the meal and opt for multiple seconds of junk food to satisfy my hunger.
This is her objection.
No it's not. That is what the article says, yes. That is not what the source interview (which i pointed you to, twice) says.
She did not mention anything about working with IDF soldiers in the entire interview. Let me repeat that to you for the 1000th time. She just plains never talks about this.
That quote you keep using is not her objection to working with IDF soldiers. It is her complaint that pro-Palestine supporters are being punished for their beliefs, but a professor can work with the IDF for 6 months, and come back to work without any consequences. She is saying the treatment is unequal. Once again, she is not objecting to working with this professor if she had to. She is objecting to the unequal treatment of pro-Palestinian vs pro-Israel supporters.
My claim at the very top of this post is that the title is wrong. Turns out I was right in every possible way. Not only was the title wrong, but so is the article.
I didn't attack the student. I didn't give an opinion on her. I am attacking the author and The Guardian for being misleading.
I'd ask you to reflect and ask yourself, what would it take to change your mind, how much proof you would need before you accept valid criticism of the author...
but we both know won't.
Faced with facts you just go straight to the name calling.
She's not objecting to him working or even hypothetically working with him. She objects to the unequal treatment of pro-Palestine supports vs pro-Israel supporters. It's clear in the interview.
Well thanks for your time. I'm sorry and I hope your life goes better.
But if you are facing mental health issues and a free or inexpensive AI that is available and doesn't burden your friends actually helps you, do you really care about your information and being profited from?
Put it this way, if Google was being super transparent with you and said, "we'll help treat you, and in exchange we use your info to make a few thousand dollars." Will you the individual say, "no thanks I'd rather pay a few hundred per therapy session instead"?
Even if you hate it, you have to admit it's hard to say no. Especially if it works.