NicolaHaskell

If you can afford to pay cash then take the loan and invest the cash elsewhere, and if you can beat the interest on the loan then come back to write better financial advice than this. And even if you can't you'd at least have done something interesting.

Devastation shocks the brain full of thoughts and feelings, navigating around the rocks takes courage

They're not both right. Vile rhetoric sews division. Calling it out and appealing to humanity are acts of strength that bind us together.

The responses to this on the other post were the same, punitive and wrathful with no space left for critical thinking.

How many people shop online then consume media showing the impacts of climate change or reports of warehouse working conditions within the delivery window? How many "fuck cars" users also subscribe to gentle parenting content? How many were raised in Christian homes and currently hold negative views on religion generally?

I roast seasoned chickpeas for snacking like that. I'll top pan fried chickpeas with leftover rice and carrot then let those steam up with the lid on. It helps contain popping beans too lol

Those sweet potatoes are close to Grandma Appalachia's traditional preparation that she got from a recipe her Irish aunt tore out of a magazine back in the 70s, but hers included a hoppy beer to balance the hot sauce

The FOX standard 😂 news when it humiliates the opposition, levity in between

I'm still talking about standards of reporting, and pointing out that Internet culture tends to be especially vocal about truth and science while amplifying the same ol' sensationalism and romanticism.

I'm not blaming, I don't think the reporting is horny either. The concept is fascinating, if anything I'm horny for more of a middle ground between fluff and the original paper.

Standards for reporting on Internet forums are the same as for the grocery store tabloids that agitated the forum dwellers to begin with

What's the "intimate detail"? The novelty I got here was the revelation of three instead of two proteins involved in this binding site. Is that "the" binding between the egg and sperm or is it a secondary/support linkage?

Squeamish