Nighed

joined 1 year ago
[–] Nighed@sffa.community 4 points 1 year ago

Possibly moderation bots too.

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I guess so, it depends how they are treating them though. Image files (probably) are not being used to distribute malware and are going to create a lot more dead links.

Is this change live? We could probably test it. (Re read the article - not yet)

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 25 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's not as bad as the title - read the TLDR.

It's a resonably sensible change. I wouldn't be surprised if they extend it to images etc (on a longer timescale) as I keep seeing people hosting images off discord...

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that, as I understand, YouTube still loses money.

They could probably break even if they screwed over their creators like other platforms, but their creators are their moat.

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

And that's the restructuring one? Does that let them escape or decrease their leases?

(Not familiar with American bankruptcy laws(...or any bankruptcy laws))

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 26 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Any idea if this is a proper (shut down) bankruptcy, or a get cheaper leases bankruptcy?

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 3 points 1 year ago

Ah, in the link to the other article it gives an example of so eone who was informed 2 days before the flight (4 after it was cancelled)

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

...I still can't see it? I see references for being on sale for 48 hours after cancellation, and not notifying customers for 48 days.

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 16 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It wasn't clear in the article - how much notice did the customers get?

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 1 points 1 year ago

Where does one note stack up against the options suggested here?

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 1 points 1 year ago

I prefer that they are spending the money one actually developing advanced/new engine technologies than just releasing a half baked cames and a huge profit.

They got loads more money than they expected and increased the scope to match.

(I agree on the pricy ships though)

Even if they went bust and the game failed, I would be happy if other big studios got the engine.

[–] Nighed@sffa.community 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is the big crunch back on the menu?

view more: ‹ prev next ›