You want to frame your issue in a way that makes the right wing hate 'o spehere go absolutely insane. They will broadcast your cause far and wide.
Nomecks
joined 2 years ago
The break even on carbon emissions from manufacture vs. daily use is somewhere between around 3 and 10 years. Big trucks on the low end.
It gets paid for by savings in road network maintenance. More people on transit = less cars destroying everything.
Did you report doordash to the police?
No third party will ever have a chance of being successful. The Dems and Repubs wrote the laws to make sure of it. That's why they can't.
Seems like a no lose scenario for the Liberals: Courts will strike this down and the Liberals take another talking point away from the Conservatives.
The battery density needed to make electric flight possible is ~400wh/KG, which we are well past. There's no technological limitations blocking transatlantic flight.
Also, the question wasn't if we were close, it was if it's easier in ships or planes.
Aviation, simply because the regulations are so intense. The technology is there for both already, but it will be far easier to cram a freighter with batteries than a plane because of the engineering and safety requirements. Ships need a minimum of fault tolerance compared to planes, for example.
No, he was too busy making out with his Marilyn Monroebot
Floating point coprocessor
It's contracting. The trick is to have something else lined up after. You make a lot but you have to actively keep yourself employed and trained.