NoneOfUrBusiness

The thing about voting for Harris is that if she wins while endorsing genocide it signals to the DNC that their constituents are either pushovers who can't make demands of their elites or okay with genocide. There's a very real argument that setting this precedent is going to be worse for America than four years of Trump with a Democrat Senate (assuming democrat voters don't drop the ball on Senate elections) that's doing opposition instead of cheering on the genocide. If the Dems know they can ignore their constituents and win, they'll pander a lot more to Republicans and hasten the decay of American democracy.

Note: I say genocide because this is the most important issue to Muslim voters, but it could be immigration, the lack of a primary, or any other DNC nonsense this election cycle.

Okay I'll just say: Y'all deserve Trump. Seriously. If this community is even remotely representative of politically active democrats then y'all had it coming. Why is it that when I'm representing a viewpoint that's not considered here everyone's kneejerk reaction is to dismiss that viewpoint and shoot the messenger? No matter how you feel about it the fact that there are people who think that and the fact that they have valid reasons for thinking that remains. Arguing with me about their opinions changes nothing, and neither does mocking them.

It is believable. I mean it's happening, and denying that this sort of attitude isn't part of the reason is denying reality. I never said it's rational, because it isn't, but it's a thing and it's partially leftists not understanding that that got you (and us since your elections affect everyone) into this situation to begin with.

I'm not American so I'm not voting either way. Also I wasn't saying I'd vote Republican or condoning it, but the sheer condescension I saw in that exchange makes it more believable if this exchange is in any way representative of politically active democrat voters. I also didn't say I was voting republican in any part of my comment so I'm curious where you got that from.

That aside, you said blueMAGA isn't a thing but preemptively blaming genocide victims for not licking the boot hard enough (instead of, you know, acting in solidarity or holding your leaders accountable) is definitely blueMAGA behavior. Getting defensive whenever someone points the very real flaws in your genocidal candidate's campaign strategy (that was, in fact, how this comment chain started) and how they're treating their constituents is blueMAGA behavior. Resorting to name calling whenever someone makes an objective, non-opinionated statement that indicts your candidate, or—god forbid—actually have an opinion that doesn't agree with your is blueMAGA behavior. How do I know? Because it's regular MAGA behavior with a dash of blue paint. And before you resort to more name calling, these are all things I experienced in this very same comment chain, for making these two statements: "Of course Arab and Mudlim Americans aren't voting for Harris how did anybody expect anything else" and "No it's not because they want fascism how did you even come to that conclusion ". If you disagree with either statement you're welcome yo try and actually refute them with arguments, but if the only thing you have to say is calling me a Republican/troll/whatever then don't bother.