Quebec… I’m not going to touch that one.
Damnit now I'm curious.
Quebec… I’m not going to touch that one.
Damnit now I'm curious.
Uh... We all know Trump is bad you're not proving anything here. However, policies aside, Harris's campaign sucked ass. If you don't understand or refuse to accept that then there's no conversation to be had here.
Edit: I was responding to an argument that doesn't exist nvm.
Uh... That's not really the point here. There are people hunting FEMA workers there for... reasons, so while we don't have the whole story I doubt this was a politically motivated decision as much as one made for self-preservation.
Literally no u if you think these things have anything to do with who wins a presidential election. These matter after you win (I distinguish between economics as a science and the economy itself here); who wins a presidential election is determined by how people feel about each candidate and that has nothing to do with any of the two things you listed.
America have now twice ran a female candidate against trump, and twice lost. People forget that trump did not run for president 3 times. He's run for president 5 times.
Uh... He literally didn't, though. He participated in two primaries before 2016, but he never actually ran as the presidential nominee for any party. Trump won twice and lost once, and coincidentally that once was the one time the DNC ran a serious candidate with a real platform that appealed to voters against him. The similarity that the two times they ran fucking jokes they were both women is simply not anything more than correlation here.
I meant for everyone as in the 4Bs apply to all men, not just those of a certain political alignment.
Both of those are indeed normal. Not trying to both sides Trump's dishonesty I know he was ridiculous about it but literally yeah politicians lie all the time and propaganda is their bread and butter.
To be very fair there is value to experts confirming something that is already widely speculated, and there are organizations and groups who need to prepare for likely Trump actions. It's just that in this case what they're confirming is obvious and therefore not very useful.
The Korean 4B movement is for everyone. It probably makes more sense in Korea, but I'm not sure what the point of applying it in the US is.
Oh yeah my bad there. I've seen enough "there was no problem with Harris's campaign" takes that I kinda default to that.
To respond to the actual point you made, let's first forget about any comparisons to Republicans because that's just not the point here. After that I wanna establish that Biden's administration is, by all means, an exception. He ran on an explicitly left-wing platform that Bernie had a role in creating, and despite still being a corporate democrat did things that actually helped the working class. Compared to his campaign Harris ran on "nothing will fundamentally change" and straight up said she didn't have anything in mind that she'd do differently from Biden regarding the economy. That rejection of change, which shaped her campaign as a whole (the economy is just the most egregious example), is abandoning a working class who desperately needs change. Add in how Harris explicitly tried to court Republicans and we have reason to believe the DNC intended to shift to the right rather than the left, again abandoning the working class.