Ononotagain

joined 1 year ago
[–] Ononotagain@kbin.social 7 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

If only they had someone worth voting FOR.

[–] Ononotagain@kbin.social 15 points 6 months ago (2 children)

He asked what would happen in the city if the ordinances were to remain blocked.

“The city’s hands will be tied. It will be forced to surrender its public spaces, as it [already] has been,” Evangelis said.

This is the crux of it. The city does not consider the homeless to be the "public". Can't be homeless and a citizen at the same time apparently.

To make this clear, this is a about the government further destroying the entire concept of "public spaces". Dividing further who counts as "the public".

[–] Ononotagain@kbin.social 5 points 9 months ago

It's about fracking time!!

[–] Ononotagain@kbin.social 33 points 9 months ago

Too big to fail = to big to leave to corporate capitalism. If it is so important to our nation, then nationalize it.

[–] Ononotagain@kbin.social 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Not trying to pick a fight, but having regulations is not the same thing as regulating. At least not in the context of this thread.