PeepinGoodArgs

joined 1 year ago
[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 5 points 8 months ago

And if my feet are cold, then I'm cold.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 6 points 9 months ago

Symptom of a society that hates people

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 0 points 9 months ago

Ahh, the OceanGate incident. Good times (except for that poor son).

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 0 points 9 months ago (2 children)

It's just...there...on the internet...because the most powerful people in the world are bumbling fools with no sense of security.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 3 points 9 months ago

Damn! That's a good one!

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 36 points 9 months ago (6 children)

Wtf kind of god do you believe in?

The kind that allows people to be murdered in what is ostensibly his house.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

the bottle half of the population together share just 3% of wealth,

Lol what?

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 31 points 9 months ago

“Who benefits [from renewables]?” thundered United Australia Party Senator Ralph Babet. “The globalists benefit! You don’t benefit. The Chinese Communist Party benefits!

My favorite is how they can spout absolute bullshit and never have to defend it. Their supporters make no demands of them other than to feed their fears.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 48 points 9 months ago

Now, the enshittifiers aren’t taking this lying down. Take Lina Khan, the brilliant head of the US Federal Trade Commission, who has done more in three years on antitrust than the combined efforts of all her predecessors over the past 40 years. The Wall Street Journal’s editorial page has run more than 80 pieces trashing Khan, insisting that she’s an ineffectual ideologue who can’t get anything done. Sure, that’s why you ran 80 editorials about her. Because she can’t get anything done.

I love when other people realize the value of Lina Khan. I'll vote for Biden for the sole reason to let Lina Khan do good work!

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 2 points 9 months ago

Holy shit, YES!

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 42 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Sweeney’s coverage, which uses publicly available data from Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and broadcast signals from aircrafts...

Morrone added that there was “no legitimate interest in or public need for this information, other than to stalk, harass, and exert dominion and control”.

There's no need for public information from the FAA and broadcast signals from aircraft except domination and control?

This dude has to be a republican.

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 1 points 9 months ago

That's good stuff!

view more: ‹ prev next ›