Yep, this is originally a righty post. That's why I'm so confused that it's actually kind of based. The rough consensus here is that it's based, so we have bi-partisan support. Let's get this on the Congress floor!
PhrygianFudge
In the more fortunate situation, yes
Yeah, I get it, I'm just not American :D
I'm not American either, but I'm suggesting anyway
Either a pun or a "cringe" here
Is that for or against? Do we want extra states or an "I told you so" more? Genuinely difficult question.
I'm hearing a "cringe" here, though I've heard quite a few "based"s (no consesus as is tradition for leftist discourse) ... I think "based" is winning?
No annexing. The blue states join with Canada to establish a union of states. We could call it "United States" or something, or idk, I'm not good with names.
Ah. Well, a short victory, I think, would have been a decisive blow to Russia. I think that could even have lead to a regime-change. I definitely don't like the idea that so many people should suffer to weaken the enemy. Giving Ukraine much more to begin with would have showed Russia not to fuck with its neighbours. If that's what the original commenter meant, I definitely understand their point of view.
Signing up on that instance and then going on political communities' posts is such a power-move