PoisonedPrisonPanda

joined 2 years ago

yah thats what i meant.

in a way.

[–] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 days ago (2 children)

luks will also prevent or uphold the encryption if e.g. the power is pulled?

+this means that if someone breaks in, cuts the cables during running decrypted the data is still safe?

[–] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago (2 children)

you mean that even if the next user formats it you make sure that leftovers/artefacts cannot be read right?

[–] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (9 children)

asking out of curiousity: what benefits does encryption have here?

as long the server runs everything is decrypted right? so you are encrypting for the case when someone actively steals your hardware?

edit: stealing as in taking away. but this would mean accessing during runtime is nonetheless possible in a decrypted way?

well.

guide definition:

A structured, often comprehensive document that provides step-by-step instructions to help users complete a task

whats the difference?

[–] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 week ago (4 children)

good summary.

two thoughts

  • can any expert mention any disadvantages here?
  • what does coolify has to do with this guide?
[–] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

https://getgreenshot.org/

sitting in the sam boat at work. I like it even more than flameshot at home.

[–] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I like that argument. however the only country which is below china in the list of net oil exporter is the US.

which invalidates it.

but sure. US is its own shitshow itself.

[–] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

thats pretty common, in my country as well.

like a two factor authentication. but without TOTP. but with a proprietary app by the bank provided.

[–] PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can easily just pay those people with tax money for a transfer period and it would still save money for the taxpayer overall.

you do not think that those people are able to use arithmetics for calculating that do you?

technical readiness level for hydrogen production is lacking. adoption is slowed down by chicken egg problem (steam methane reforming vs pyrolysis/electrolysis)

but yeah. I sign your points.

17
database greenhorn (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de to c/programming@programming.dev
 

hi my dears, I have an issue at work where we have to work with millions (150 mln~) of product data points. We are using SQL server because it was inhouse available for development. however using various tables growing beyond 10 mln the server becomes quite slow and waiting/buffer time becomes >7000ms/sec. which is tearing our complete setup of various microservices who read, write and delete from the tables continuously down. All the stackoverflow answers lead to - its complex. read a 2000 page book.

the thing is. my queries are not that complex. they simply go through the whole table to identify any duplicates which are not further processed then, because the processing takes time (which we thought would be the bottleneck). but the time savings to not process duplicates seems now probably less than that it takes to compare batches with the SQL table. the other culprit is that our server runs on a HDD which is with 150mb read and write per second probably on its edge.

the question is. is there a wizard move to bypass any of my restriction or is a change in the setup and algorithm inevitable?

edit: I know that my questions seems broad. but as I am new to database architecture I welcome any input and discussion since the topic itself is a lifetime know-how by itself. thanks for every feedbach.

view more: next ›