One could argue that the dynamic shadows of the day and night cycle in Sea of Stars were actually kind of breaking new ground in pixel art.
Prunebutt
And the weird jpegs are it's cum...?
Relax. It's a nylon ukulele string.
Guilty as charged. (:
No state "deserves" statehood. Statehood should be dismatled.
Kamala would be doing the exact same thing as Donald Trump.
Correction: she would let Israel do as it pleases without officially cheering them on.
I, too would like to meet Sasquatch one day. /j
That's the one that's really easy to hack, isn't it? Now what?
You won't get arrested for critizing Israel. That's not illegal here.
You do run the risk of losing your visa, or getting deported, if you're not a German citizen. And you might get sued for relatively minor things, if the case is connected to palestine solidarity. Also, judges and prosecutors will judge you more harshly, due to the Bundestagsresolution.
Here's an article on the matter
Der Antisemitismusbeauftragte der Bundesregierung fordert härtere Strafen für vermeintlich antisemitische Vorfälle sowie den Einsatz von Sicherheitsbehörden wie dem Verfassungsschutz an Universitäten. Ferner sollten Aussagen wie „From the River to the Sea“ unter Strafe gestellt werden: „Mit Prävention allein kommen wir dem grassierenden Antisemitismus nicht bei.“
If you shout that Israel should be destroyed or that all Jews should ..., then you might get arrested, but that's not criticism.... You can replace the country or religion with any other... Hate speech is not tolerated in Germany and that's good.
My whole point is that criticism of Israel is equated to anisemitism. That's the whole deal behind the ISRHA definition.
Here's the wikipedia definition
Plagiarism is the representation of another person's language, thoughts, ideas, or expressions as one's own original work.
So, I'm afraid that my definition is closer to consensus than yours.
If word gets out that you used a ghostwriter, you're gonna get in trouble for plagiarism. That's the thing they'll accuse you of.
While consent is a part of why plagiarism is shitty, it's not what makes something plagiarism. You can check it the other way around: if I'm legitimately quoting someone, do I need explicit consent, or is it implied (if it's published work)?
About the BSD stuff: yeah, it might not be illegal and consential, but both of these things aren't necessary for plagiarism.
I know the phrase and you're using it wrong. Do you think that there weren't examples of that stuff already happening?
I don't really get what you're saying. Are you in favor of making the phrase illegal, or not?
The mere existence of the term "israelbezogener Antisemitismus" proves me right. The IHRA definition is commonly known to equate the two, which is why the Jerusalem declaration exists.