A lot of food actually is free. The commons supported a lot of people in the middle ages with nuts, berries and orchards.
The point was that private property is what creates the drudge.
A lot of food actually is free. The commons supported a lot of people in the middle ages with nuts, berries and orchards.
The point was that private property is what creates the drudge.
Yes, food takes a lot of work. But we're a lot of people with very advanced technology. If we got rid of a few bullshit and counter-productive jobs, the work each and everyone of us would have to do would vanish in comparison to today's hustle culture.
Also, money is literally power and no one handles power well. It corrupts and the more money the more it ruins people. It really is the root of all that's bad.
Anarchist spotted. ❤️🖤
Big "Yet you participate in society" vibes on this one.
Tell me: How does agriculture require private property?
I'm sorry... what? O.o
ffs 🙄
You don't have to go down the same way you came up.
Why don't you just shut up about stuff you have no idea about.
Edit: Ski mountaneering being way more likely is simple statistics: since way more people are mountaineering than taking the helicopter, it's just more likely that this skier was mountaineering.
Skiing is usually used to refer to skiing on maintained ski areas downhill or cross country skiing.
No true scotsman fallacy. Also, you're pulling the "is usually used to refer" out of your ass.
Ski mountaineering is more like skiing than cross-country skiing. It's quite common in the alps to do that and you almost never go on prepared tracks. The mountain where I spent my teenage winters after school doesn't even really have an official, prepared track for about 75% of the skiing terrain, because it's too steep.
As I said: you have no idea.
Doing it on foreign terrain which you clearly don't know well enough and at speed is leaving the bounds of regular skiing.
I ain't saying it was smart. But it's not "extreme".
Edit:
Sorry, you weren't the person who called thir "extreme". But still: Basing whether or not something is considered as "skiing" on how well you know the terrain (they could have gone down that mountain for 20 times already, for all you know, since crevaces like can form after you've made yourself familiar with the terrain), or how fast you do so is just dumb. When does it stop being "skiing"? At 20km/h? At 35 km/h? 27.5?
It's way more likely to be ski mountaineering. It's quite common in the alps and you almost never go on prepared tracks when you do.
If that's "extreme", then Austria is full of extreme sports folks.
And this ain't skiing.
Sorry to be so blunt. But you're either very dumb or you have no idea about alpine skiing.
And I need to reiterate that the Darwin award is pseudoscientific and eugenicist-adjacent.
You got a better idea for text mode?
this wouldn't happen when prepared adequately and behaved appropriately
I agree. But this is hardly extreme skiing.
If this qualified for your stupid "haha, someone who 'deserved it' died" award, then you could give that out to 80% of people staying in a hut in the alps.
Let's abolish the former.