Psyhackological

joined 1 year ago
[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml -1 points 10 months ago

They are getting closer to this but also I think those projects emerged from being old and unorganized so they want to do it decently.

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, but also companies say that Linux support is not worth it (gaining money and spending on the support) compared to - slapping barely working Windows port and call it a day.

For now Linux support is more like pleasant surprise than a official respected thing.

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

For me it was always a niche that wasn't taken full advantage of.

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (11 children)

Let me clarify myself

*It's impossible to get big corporate guys attention so they ship Linux by default and it's clearly tested. For now the Valve, System76, Framework and Tuxedo are exception.

Edit: Also I was keeping in mind corporate entity behind OS.

  • Apple - MacOS
  • Microsoft - Windows
  • ? - Linux
[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago (2 children)

List me what is standardized on Linux.

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Yeah but you can have default choices that are guarantee to work.

And yeah preinstalled checked hardware would be ideal.

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 0 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Let's say something like systemd standarization.

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

At least on Linux you can have some kind of control while on Windows or Mac there is an illusion like "can't do that, fuck you", while Linux is like "can do that... will you manage"?

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Launchers be like

[–] Psyhackological@lemmy.ml 1 points 10 months ago

Sure, I have tested Grayjay already when NewPipe was broken by Google.

view more: ‹ prev next ›