Having a tool that can be used greatly without restrictions without any additional bullshit. For me that's FOSS but I know that when comes to maturity and development community is the main component of great end product.
Psyhackological
joined 9 months ago
That's absolutely sucks I agree...
Yeah the "organisation" stuff behind... To be honest anything can show negative or positive effects on the end product. I see it in my job, college and even the Unity or CrowdStrike can make such examples.
That's correct, but sometimes in that sense you don't engage with anyone and just read the docs. Also there are some cases when main contributors were toxic or unhelpful in a long run that community decided to create independent fork that's more FOSS driven, not by elitism driven.
Yeah that's a better opinion than mine.
My opinion: let's separate the software and the people making it. If it's great tool and FOSS why not use it? You use software, not people.
EDIT: I know that FOSS heavily relies on community but also that's the point. I don't see how toxic comminity can progress further while more open minded and kind fork will be a better choice of the same software base.
Ah, I see, I thought so.
You could list it, but I tried to migrate Obsidian to Logseq. For now, I have no time. I mostly write MarkDown though.
So it's a layer that says "bro I got this, don't mind that I run this game in the background and let take care of resolution with Hz"?
Ah I see so you can look up in game what are the best responses for your opening. Smart.
Yeah true