PythagreousTitties

The forms are literally for informing the public about gifts received.

I now know you haven't even read the article, so talking to you about this is meaningless since all you seem to want to be is right. I was asking a serious question about the process, not looking to argue about whatever it is youre looking to argue about. Thanks for wasting my time.

Enjoy the rest of your day.

The tickets were all listed on the forms they use to report gifts. There's no leaking the gifts like you're imagining.

That's all explained in the article.

Nice edit after the fact.
You're obviously emotional about this, and I could care less, I'm just asking about the process.

Chill out homie.

If they used in anyway then the bribe was successful. If they only accepted it as a "whatever thanks", filed it in the books, and then never used it then they were not successful bribed.

That's my point of view on it. Obviously flat out not accepting it would be key though.
I'm not well versed in the area of accepting bribes. But Im willing to learn first-hand. Wink wink

I'm asking if they check to see if the tickets were used. I don't know why that's difficult for you to understand.

I mean, yeah that's what I'm saying. Do they check to see if they were used? verything is electronic. There are no paper tickmaster tickets.

Yeah. He was sooooo close to not winning almost thirty medals... Weed was such a huge factor right?

The headline doesn't say conservatives.
I thought it did too.

Wow thank you. That's what I read it as too, and I was thinking oh this is where they draw the line with this wacko?

His worm friend.

Im flabbergasted about needing to put a bicycle next to it for some reason. They added that to their "plan".

These people were also full grown 60 year old adults.

Does "accepting" a gift/ticket mean they used that ticket? What if someone accepted a ticket, put it on the form as a gift, but didn't use it? Or are they one and the same.