RandomGen1

I gave their profile a cursory look, but I couldn't find this in the few handfuls of posts I looked at. Do you have a link to a comment or two showing this, maybe I missed it?

My preferred way around this is to spoiler the tag, since there's a few other tags of this sort floating around: /j (joking), /hj (half-joking), /srs (serious) for a few examples. Doing that still gives you a moment of not giving up the joke, but it's still ultimately there for anyone that wants or needs it

I watched the director's extended cut and wow that cut makes it so clear that the director is a pedophile it's disgusting. We looked up the differences after and it's the majority of the more questionable scenes. Similarly we looked up the director's wiki page and he's got some gross history (see personal life)

I would argue that this title implicitly suggests there's no genocide in Gaza while the other title doesn't reach beyond the bounds of Gaza.

As to the "wiki is a bad source" I don't claim to have any knowledge of that poster's thoughts, but here's a couple possibilities I've come up with:

They thought it was interesting that the genocide was evident to the "ordinary" person that edits wiki despite them thinking it's typically a bad source

They are just some random ml user whose opinions on wikipedia don't strictly match that of the concensus of lemmygrad, hexbear, et. al. Since those instances are more united on that stance than I've observed Lemmy.ml to be (right or wrong as they may be, not making a judgment here)

All keyless start kias and hyundais are/were immune to the Kia boys trick

It's specific to the upcoming update with the proto-frames where they're still obviously human, and are specific characters rather than generic warframes

I would advise against the water soluble wrapper pods since they're iirc a major contributor to microplastics in our water

From Tumblr, I'd bet?

Ah you're right, I just read what I thought was there probably because of the subtext op gave. It was just a university lab in Indiana. The only connection then is that some of the people that worked on it are (assuming here) Chinese

I think your title is misleading. It was a joint effort between a DOE lab and a university lab ~~Chinese lab~~.

That aside nothing to me really seems to indicate a relationship between the tin catalysts for this and the euv droplets beyond they're both tin, and small. For euv, they need to be propelled through the air (and liquid? [might be done by the laser, idr]), but this technology it sounds like they're solids on a substrate.

Being able to make tin particles a controlled size that small may help euv, but I think it's a bit of a spurious connection.

I saw an article somewhere on lemmy recently that had some commentary from an American tear-down r&d type shop that said they think BYD makes a small profit on them

Per 2 hours even! Makes that 1500 hours