ReversalHatchery

joined 1 year ago
[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 4 hours ago

do you have canvasblocker? some settings in it can heavily affect performance. other addons may have to do with this too

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 11 points 19 hours ago

to respond to the title, I'm not sure about that. your problems are with the samsung system, not with all the custom roms. I think it's not only graphene that's the solution. It's even only available for a little subset of the phones.

that's good to be aware of, thanks

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 5 points 2 days ago

I disagree that users won't do stuff on their own. They will, but they will allocate very little time to it, on average, especially when compared to a tech savy person. And that's just because their computer is a tool.And if they cannot make their tool work for what they want to do, they'll find another way. Or deem it impossible.

also don't forget that many don't even have the time and energy

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 11 points 2 days ago

and start off from a fundamentally wrong premise: that people are willing (let alone wanting) to manage their own operating systems.

people shouldn't need to manage their own operating systems, to begin with

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 2 days ago

in my understanding OP was not comparing it to simple wireguard

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

where did you read it that rust obfuscates the code?

you want vmprotect and such for that

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago

It's up to users to know what they are installing.

Except when all you get is an UAC prompt when clicking the play button, without giving you any information, other than that it wants to execute an exe in a temp dir with a random name.

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago

the kernel level part of that specific thing is preventing process startup after it was killed

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

antimalware is literally worthless as has been for at least a decade. not even once did I get a spyware (or other) alert for the software of any commercial data harvester company. they are literally bought out and even the blind can see this

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 2 points 3 days ago

afaik duckduckgo knows all of this.

site: limits the site to search on, even shows a warning for that.
"quotes" make sure all results contain the word.
-apple make sure you wont see results where the page contains this word

[–] ReversalHatchery@beehaw.org 1 points 3 days ago (2 children)

to simple wireguard? there are wireguard based mesh network solutions out there

 

Recently there was a post where the OP pitched an idea for a service related to this community. I don't want to go into details but the post's text has shown that maybe there's some misunderstanding around the technology, and a considerable amount of us also thought that it's not a good idea.
The post was removed (noticed because I couldn't reply to someone) probably because the OP felt shame for their "failed" idea, but I think we shouldn't delete posts for reasons like this.

The post created an interesting discussion around the idea with useful info. It's useful to have things like these for future reference, for similar discussions in the future.
This is an anonymous forum, so there's no shame in recommending things, when you do that politely like it was done in that case.

view more: next ›